Photobucket
Nordwave Serbia
Sep
27
2009
0

UN Promoting Homosexuality In Serbia

The head of the United Nations (UN) mission in Serbia recently promoted a highly controversial homosexual rights demonstration in Belgrade against public opposition and beyond his mandate to work “closely with national governments” to “advocate the interests and mandates of the UN.”UN Resident Coordinator William Infante backed a “gay pride” parade scheduled for September 20th, an event that Serbs have rejected since the last time it was orchestrated in 2001. According to the Associated Press (AP), the organizers canceled the march rather than accept the government’s offer of an alternative route, which was a response to concerns about its ability to provide adequate security due to rising public opposition to the event.  Infante’s advocacy for the ill-fated event has angered groups which are concerned about the increasing pressure on Serbia from the UN and European institutions to adopt a radical homosexual agenda that goes well beyond justifiable protections against discrimination.

Conservative UN watchers were also alarmed that the resident coordinator, who is “the designated representative of the Secretary-General for development operations” according to the UN, took an official position contrary to the consensus of UN member states which have repeatedly rejected inclusion of “sexual orientation and gender identity” among accepted categories of anti-discrimination in any binding UN human rights document.

Despite the fact that UN members have rejected the idea, Infante nonetheless suggested that the special category already exists when advocated for the event along with his counterpart from the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). Infante stated: “It is very important for all nations to protect all people from discrimination. Human rights are universal and inalienable to all, and these two principles of universality and non-discrimination must be upheld.” at a recent meeting Infante has also cited a recent poll backed by the EU and UN Development Program (UNDP) to suggest that Serbs were willing to embrace a broad view of “anti-discrimination,” but close examination of the poll reveals that nearly forty percent of Serbs are concerned about the protection of their children and the “bad example” that may be set by promoting homosexuality in Serbian society.

http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/sep/09092411.html

Written by admin in: Uncategorized |
Aug
01
2009
0

The Politics of Serbia in the 1990s

Answering Robert Thomas

By Father Matthew Raphael Johnson

Robert Thomas, former OSCE bureaucrat, wrote a book some time ago purporting to give an honest view of Serbian politics in the 1990s. The book, however, is largely a hackneyed account of Serbia from the point of view of that mythical entity, the “International Community,” which, to the extent it exists at all, is the summation of a series of elite opinions, converging on one main point: the chief evil of the world is nationalism, and more specifically, Christian Orthodox nationalism. Whether Anglo-American or continental, whether Democrat or Republican, whether capitalist or socialist, the same tune is sung: nationalism must end, and the peoples of the world must be “forced to be free”: forced into a single global economic order without borders, without culture, without identity. This is the official political position of what I have termed the “Regime,” or that nexus of private capital and the state, seeking to maximize market share and exploit the labor and resources of developing countries in the creation of a “new economic order.” In order for a scholar or journalist to be “reputable,” he must parrot this line with minimal deviation. It is the official view of the U.S. State Department, and those entities that control academic research: the National Institute for Democracy, the Carnegie Institute, the Rockefeller Foundation, Ford Foundation, the Open Society Institute, and their various underlings, usually foundations attached to large corporations such as the Shell Foundation and BP’s Foundation.

The evidence for this is not difficult to find, it is an “open secret,” if you will. The truth “hides in plain sight.” The webpage www.capitalresearch.org contains a database where all the major foundations reveal the people and institutions that benefit from their largesse. Each one, without exception, takes the above line as a given. Therefore, no one can build a career without pleasing those that hold the purse strings, and hence, one must spout the line in order to function an become part of the mainstream. It is, hence, institutionalized intellectual dishonesty.

In this brief paper, I’d like to poke a little fun at the foibles and intellectual dishonesty at the “Conclusions” section of this book, the section which brings together the more or less hidden agenda of its author, as a card-carrying member of the Euro-Bureaucrat establishment. I will quote a brief passage, and then answer it briefly. This paper, then, simply gives another set of examples of the “mainstream” myths and half-truths that journalists and scholars are forced to accept in order to become “reputable.”

The reality is this: The west, that is, the System based on western corporate capital (including media and entertainment) and state power, was interested in Serbia/Kosovo for three reasons:

* To have unhampered access to the trillions of dollars worth of gems, gold and other minerals under the surface of Kosovo and parts of Bosnia, as well as,
* To have a “cooperative” Serbia in order to make way for an oil pipeline from the Caspian Sea that would bypass Russia, as well as,
* To provide a basically “safe” test case for future interventions, largely due to public and, to a great extent, elite ignorance of the area. In other words, one could pretty much say anything about Serbs and it would be believed.

These reasons, and these reasons alone explain why suddenly, in the post-Cold War world, the System become so obsessively interested in a small and obscure part of their world.

1. Thomas writes: “major inequalities existed between the ruling SPS [Serbian Socialist Party] and the newly created opposition parties. . .the SPS based its appeal as much on its capacity to dispense patronage as its ability to articulate a coherent ideology” (422)

Mr. Thomas has led a very sheltered life. Little does he know that all establishment political parties work this way. Patronage is its very lifeblood. The parties in question, at one time called the DEPOS group, are largely the creation of foreign powers with an agenda identical to the official stance of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. They are “opposition” parties only with respect to the ruling SPS. Globally, they are radically establishment parties, slavishly copying the line given to them by their financiers. Oddly, throughout this lengthy and fairly well-written treatment, Mr. Thomas refuses to give even a sentence to the sources of funding for the “opposition” parties. This is because Thomas is aware that the funding is largely from the Regime, i.e. the Soros (et al.) complex.

2. “In particular, Slobodan Milosevic sought, through a trusted clique of security service operatives, to construct, within the framework of the police force, his own paramilitary private army. . .” (423)

Again, Mr. Thomas is no expert in Comparative Politics. Of course, the reality is that such behavior indeed took place, but it is to be expected in the context of failing statehood. Yugoslavia, always a dubious project, was falling apart because of the fact that it was based on a personal, rather than institutional, authority. No Tito, no Yugoslavia. Who took over after the dead tyrant represented the worst element of the bureaucratic elite, an elite shared by all countries, regardless of political system or core beliefs. This is not the fault of Milosevic, but rather was built into the system after WWII.

3. “With the SPS controlling the state apparatus it was able to determine the conditions under which elections were fought.” (423)

This is a major core argument of the book, and is designed to rationalize the often poor performance of the “opposition” parties, even in a context of a failing economy. Unfortunately, Mr. Thomas can’t seem to get his mind wrapped around Yugoslavia prior to Slobo. Yugoslavia was a one party state since World War II. There was no other bureaucracy, no other group available to run elections, unless Mr. Thomas suggests the SPS train a new bureaucracy, one more congenial to Soros, and then give up all social power prior to the elections, putting it in their hands. The state itself was politicized, as are all states. In America, the media is controlled by three or four powerful families: Sulzberger, Graham, Geffen, Levin. They decide who deserves attention and who does not, what issues are “important” and what are not; what arguments are “reasonable” and what are “extremist.” Having been involved in many third-party campaigns in America, I can personally attest to the institutionalized discrimination and organized resistance to the existence of third parties. But “democratic” is a code word. It is a reference not to procedures, but to results: a result is “democratic” if the parties or movements who agree with the international system win. It is “non-democratic” if my allies win.

4. Speaking of Slobo, “He had created around himself a highly personal web of extra-institutional political, economic and coercive power (sultanism)” (424)

It’s odd that in our “multi-cultural” society, the only time it’s acceptable to refer to a third world people without organized worship is in reference to Slavic nationalism. Slobo did do what Mr. Thomas piously accuses him of, but again, this is to be expected in the context of a situation where institutions were always placed on the back burner in reference to charismatic, personal authority, invested in Tito. Ironically, the fact that the “opposition” movement (such as it was) was itself based on extra-institutional, indeed extra-continental sources of wealth and influence eludes our erstwhile author. Even if one is no fan of Slobo, the reality is that he faced the collapse of the already tottering empire of Yugoslavia. Such behavior, “sultanism” of whatever even more idiosyncratic label one wishes to use here, is fully expected and consistent with the context. Tito refused to build institutions independent of his influence, hence, when he died, they quickly collapsed.

5. “By adopting such symbols, and particularly the Kosovo symbol, Milosevic was able to transcend the normal, profane considerations of politics.” (425)

One of the odder statements in an already odd book. Indeed, it is a little strange for a socialist (of sorts) to return to the Middle Ages for legitimizing symbols, but, given the context, it is not strange at all. Kosovo is a defining moment for Serbia. A tiny people, normally under the thumb of an oppressive power, is slaughtered in large numbers against an overwhelming foe is no myth, but a historical fact. Serbia was then to become the colonial toy of the vicious Turk empire. The fact that Serbia’s history is usually a story of an exploited people, tools of larger political games, Mr. Thomas shows a shocking lack of sensitivity. For a group of people deprived of dignity and identity, whether under the Turk, Hungarian, Bulgarian, German or Marxist occupations, it might be reasonable that they be a little touchy when Islamic fanatics are threatening their existence (again) in places such as Bosnia and Kosovo. It is unlikely that Mr. Thomas would use such dismissive language if Jews were making reference to Judas Maccabeus or Jabotinsky in their political life.

6. Again, in reference to Slobo, “he became a super-political figure whose actions were not judged by normal political criteria. . . .”

Nelson Mandela, Oliver Cromwell, Leon Trotsky, George Washington, Simon Bolivar, M.L. King, Vaclav Havel. . . .

7. “The Zajedno [this is yet another foreign-funded, liberal coalition of westernized parties] coalition at the times of the 1996 federal elections (SPO, DS, DSS, GSS), appeared to lose votes as individual supporters of these parties apparently, judged the placing of the diverse groups on one electoral slate lacked credibility.”

A slightly convoluted sentence (though I’m prone to these as well), that says much of what Mr. Thomas does not want let out: “opposition” parties were voted for by an alienated, confused and patriotic population because Slobo had completely lost control of the economy and, most certainly, the money supply. They voted against a terrible handling of the economy, of course made much worse by sanctions, rather than any pro-European claptrap parroted by these Soros stooges. Inflation at this time was absurdly high (some say 100,000% a month, or even higher). How can any kind of vote, in any context, matter here at all? Are people registering opinions, or desperate cries under harsh circumstances? They are voting against something, not for it. Whenever Serbian interests were violently threatened, as in Bosnia or Kosovo, the nationalists won, whether in a socialist or national-populist guise. The fact that Milosevic was able to still do well even under these circumstances suggest that the DEPOS group or the Zajedno coalition had minimal support in Serbia, largely due to the odd fact that the”oppositionists” were speaking in a language of their tormentors, the “International Community” and its well-financed mythos.

8.”Even when the SRS (the Radical Party) was not publicly allied with the government and presented itself as instead as an “opposition” party it continued to serve the interest of the ruling party by complicating the political situation and ensuring that there be no simple confrontation between “democratic” opposition and the “anti-democratic” regime.” (430)

This is the logic of the Carnegie Foundation: If the Radicals are part of the SPS coalition, they, of course, are part of the coalition. If they oppose Milosevic, they still are part of the coalition. It must be difficult to work for the system. Here, Mr. Thomas, in a veiled way, is admitting that his definition of “opposition” is not the common sense notion of being opposed to the ruling party, but being “in communion” with international capital and its political arms. The radicals can’t, ipso facto, be the opposition because Mr. Thomas and those he works for do not agree with them. Putting it very simply, the Radicals are largely social nationalists. The SPS are trying, to some extent, to imitate the charismatic authority of Tito (and failing). They represent the [Titoist] Partisan tradition. Thus, the SPS and SRS are very different politically. The SRS represents ethno-nationalism and the [nationalist/monarchist and anti-communist] Chetnik tradition. However, they both believe themselves to be assisting in the physical defense of Serbs against their well financed and led opposition: Albanian drug dealers, Islamic radicals and Croat nationalists, in short, the instant celebrities of the Rudder Finn PR firm (who the Muslims hired just before their 1994 assault on the Serbs, and a firm largely behind the demonization of the Serbs). Mr. Thomas is struggling to link V. Seselj and Milosevic, because he dislikes them both. Hence, the SRS can never be part of the “legitimate” opposition. This is blatant intellectual dishonesty. “Legitimate” here means “democratic,” which in turn means, “liberal” and “cosmopolitan.”

9. The “boycotting tactics” pursued by the Albanian leadership under Ibrahaim Rugova effectively played into the hands of Milosevic and the Socialist regime; withdrawal from public life consigned the Albanians to the margins of public life were Milosevic could safely ignore them.” (431)

This is in reference to the elections in Kosovo in the mid-1990s, which many Albanians refused to participate in. Mr. Rugova boycotted the elections because his politics was not about votes, but about money and, from his point of view, cultivating outside contacts, both in the U.S. and in the Middle East. The fact is that the terrorist sub-cult that Mr. Rogova ran was a crime syndicate, specializing in drugs and prostitution, with the sometime connivance of U.S. and British intelligence (similar to the Beltway-created “Northern Alliance” in Afghanistan). The Albanian leadership had hired the New York based Rudder Finn PR firm, which in turn planted stories and editorials in the world’s newspapers. The Albanian leadership was being advised, like the Bosnian Muslims, Croats and the DEPOS coalition, by the United States, and their sometime ally, George Soros (though Soros was a very public ally of Clinton/Albright/Burger and their policies in Serbia). They didn�¯�¿�½t need elections. They were getting money, guns and a blind eye from the west and their friends in Europe. The elections, from their point of view, would have been an unjustifiable waste of resources.

This has been just a tiny sample of the nonsense being written about Serbia, in this case, under the cover of “objective journalism.” It is typical. It is a confrontation between ethnic nationalism and cosmopolitanism; between the local economy and the “new global order,” between sovereignty and exploitation. In Mr. Thomas’ mind, and the scholarly establishment, it is between “democracy” and something-other-than-democracy. Slobo was far from an ideal ruler, but his actions do make a degree of sense in the context of semi-institutionalism. Few would have done anything different.

What is more interesting is the sociological angle: why was it that the journalistic and academic establishment climbed aboard the hate Serbia bus at the same time, and in the same way, with minimal evidence from third party sources that Serbs were guilty of what they were being accused of: nothing short of genocide. This is a difficult question to answer: there is a built in bandwagon effect in academia, based on the fear of being called an “extremist.” This was evident at Bill Clinton’s trial, the recent Jena 6 case and Serbia. Academics have a good gig: Summers off, high salaries, total job security, social prestige, and a captive audience. Few academics will risk this to defend a people few in western academic or journalistic circles know anything about. Secondly, that both the Croat and Islamic movements were being supported by Rudder Finn, who specializes in planting stories, “academic experts,” and image makers in the support of their clients. (It should be noted here that your author was a part of a movement to get SM to hire a competing PR firm to handle his case. He gave, dismissively, a blanket “no” to this idea, an answer that still puzzles this author to this day).

Serbia is easy to demonize by a global Establishment: a small, militant, armed, patriotic and very Christian people fighting “progress.” Really, RF had it easy. There is nothing the academio-journalistic establishment hates more than elements of subject populations they can’t control: white American farmers, nationalists, Christian traditionalists, white blue-collar workers, agrarians, in short, anyone who “falls out” of their neat models and theories. Those who do not obviously see the goodness and wholesomeness in cosmopolitanism and a would order “without boundaries.” They are “subjects” to be “formed” and “processed” by the System: reeducated, if you will. The creation of this wild mythos was the purpose of the Muslims hiring RF, and is the purpose behind Mr. Thomas’ book: the demonization of a people, one considered “backward” and “ignorant” from the hallowed halls of Columbia Journalism School, the OSCE or the NYC offices of the Rockefeller Foundation. This is the very essence of post-modern politics, and is the core definition, Orwellian as it is, of “democracy.”

Source

Written by admin in: Uncategorized |
Jul
26
2009
0

Ukraine Bans Obscene Jewish Garbage

Bruno has fallen foul of the censors in Ukraine, who claim Sacha Baron Cohen’s raucous new comedy could “damage the morality” of its citizens.

The Ukrainian ministry of culture told local film distributor Sinergia it had “decided to ban all showings of this film on Ukrainian territory”.

Bruno, it said, “contains unjustified showing of genital organs”.

In addition, the film depicts what the ministry calls “homosexual perversions” in an “explicitly realist manner”.

Rated 18 in the UK, Bruno sees Cohen playing a gay Austrian fashion reporter who travels to the US to make his name.

The British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) has warned audiences the film contains “strong sex and sex references”.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/8152755.stm

Written by admin in: Uncategorized |
May
11
2009
0

Сабор укинуо имунитет Главашу

Сабор укинуо имунитет Главашу, Босна чека захтев за изручење

Хрватски сабор укинуо посланички имунитет Бранимиру Главашу, тако да више нема законских препрека да буде ухапшен, према судској пресуди којом је осуђен на десет година затвора због ратног злочина против Срба у Осијеку 1991. године. БиХ чека захтев за изручење.

Мандатно-имунитетни одбор хрватског парламента укинуо је посланички имунитет Бранимиру Главашу, који се налази у бекству у Херцеговини, тако да више нема законских препрека за његовим хапшењем према судској пресуди којом је осуђен на десет година затвора због ратног злочина против Срба у Осијеку 1991. године.

Одбор је одобрио захтев загребачког Жупанијског суда који је прошлог петка, после пресуде Главашу и осталим оптуженицима за ратни злочин у Осијеку, од Сабора затражио одобрење за Главашево притварање, односно укидање посланичког имунитета за притвор, преносе хрватски медији.

Иако данашњу одлуку Одбора још треба да потврди и хрватски парламент, то не одгађа њено извршење, будући да одлука Одбора има правну снагу док Сабор не заседа.

Припадници полиције Федерације Босне и Херцеговине обавили су први разговор са ратним злочинцем Бранимиром Главашем који је 8. маја, на дан изрицања пресуде на десет година затвора због убистава српских цивила у Осијеку 1991. године, побегао у Херцеговину.

Директор Управе полиције МУП-а ФБиХ Златко Милетић је изјавио да полиција у БиХ ништа не може предузети против Главаша док то не затражи Хрватска, где се тек данас у Сабору треба расправљати о скидању послачког имунитета за Главаша, преноси Танјуг.

“Полиција ФБиХ је Главаша информисала да ће га, ако добије захтев хрватског МУП-а, позвати и са њим обавити информативни разговор, рекао је Милетић”, истичући да је Главаш потпуно законито стекао држављанство БиХ.

Милетић је додао да се чека шта ће затражити хрватска страна, додавши да је Главаш у разговору пријавио више адреса где борави и где би морао боравити на подручју ФБиХ.

Source:  RTS

Written by admin in: Uncategorized |
Apr
26
2009
0

Мађари у Румунији траже аутономију


Највећа партија Мађара у Румунији УДМР затражила аутономију која би била на нивоу организације државе, саопштено на конгресу мађарске партије. Председник Румуније Басеску, који је присуствовао отварању конгреса, рекао да је поборник децентрализације, али да држава не прихвата кршење Устава.

Демократски савез Мађара у Румунији (УДМР) тражи аутономију која би била на нивоу организације државе, да мађарски језик добије статус званичног и да се мађарској заједници призна статус конститутивног елемента државе.

Ти захтеви наведени су у резолуцији усвојеној на конгресу највеће мађарске партије УДМР-а, који је одржан овог викенда у трансилванском граду Клужу.

У резолуцији “Наш савез, наша Европа” наводи се да је “дошло време за признавање мађарске заједнице у Румунији, са 1,5 милиона чланова, као конститутивног елемента државе и време је да се мађарски језик призна као званични на локалном и регионалном нивоу”.

Истовремено се наглашава да очување етничког идентитета може бити гарантовано “једино опредељеним формама аутономије према примеру неколико чланица Европске уније”.

У том циљу је потребан дијалог са политичком класом и са румунским цивилним друштвом ради остваривања “система аутономије на нивоу организације државе”, наводи се у резолуцији.

“У нашој Европи, мађарска заједница из Трансилваније, као и из целе Румуније, има иста права, значај и компетитивност као било која друга европска заједница”, истиче се у документу конгреса УДМР-а.

Румунски председник Трајан Басеску, који је присуствовао отварању конгреса УДМР-а, рекао је да је он “безрезервни поборник децентрализације, као суштинског елемента ширења аутономије”, али да “кршење Устава државне институције не могу прихватити”.

УДМР је од 1996. до 2008. године била у власти или је подржавала владу, али је после парламентарних избора 2008. године прешла у опозицију.

Извор: РТС

Written by admin in: Uncategorized |
Apr
09
2009
0

Kosovo Liberation Army Ran Torture Camps in Albania

Kosovo Liberation Army maintained a network of prisons in their bases in Albania and Kosovo during and after the conflict of 1999, eyewitnesses allege. Only now are the details of what occurred there emerging.

In a run-down industrial compound with shattered windows and peeling plaster in Kukes, Albania, chickens rummage for food and two trucks sit idle in a courtyard surrounded by rusted warehouses and a crumbling two-story supply building.

In the middle of the compound stands a cinderblock shack that was once the office of a mechanical plant that produced everything from manhole covers to elevator cages.

But, during the NATO bombing of the former Yugoslavia, from March to June 1999, this facility took on another purpose. It was occupied by a guerrilla force, the Kosovo Liberation Army, KLA, as a support base for their operations across the border in Serbian-ruled Kosovo.

But the factory was not merely the headquarters for guerrillas fighting the regime of Slobodan Milosevic to secure the independence of Kosovo from Serbia.

It assumed more sinister purposes: dozens of civilians, mainly Kosovo Albanians suspected of collaboration, but also Serbs and Roma were held captive there, beaten and tortured. Some were killed, their remains never recovered. The men who allegedly directed the abuses were officers of the KLA.

At least 25 people were imprisoned in Kukes, witnesses say. Amongst them were three Kosovo Albanian women. In the camp at least 18 people were killed, while others were later rescued by NATO troops.

It appears that Kukes housed one of a number of secret detention centres in Albania and Kosovo, and that prisoners were transferred from one facility to another.

Even after the NATO interventions, a camp was maintained in Baballoq/Babaloc in Kosovo, holding around 30 Serb and Roma prisoners, whose current whereabouts are unknown. Other camps in Albania may have held Serbs kidnapped in Kosovo after the war, according to four sources.

The names of several alleged perpetrators have been known to UNMIK for some time. One of them is still holding a high position in the Kosovo judiciary, Balkan Insight understands.

Bislim Zyrapi, an official of the Kosovo Interior Ministry, who was responsible for KLA operations in Kukes, told Balkan Insight that there were no people killed, either at the base or outside of it.

Two of the KLA’s former top leaders rejected the allegations in separate interviews with the BBC.

Kosovo’s Prime Minister, Hashim Thaci, who was then the political director of the KLA, and Agim Ceku, former Prime Minister and former chief of the KLA headquarters, told the BBC they were not aware of any KLA prisons where captives were abused or where civilians were held.

Thaci said he was aware that individuals had “abused KLA uniforms” after the war, but said the KLA had distanced itself from such acts. He added that such abuse was “minimal”. Ceku said that the KLA fought a “clean war”.

However, Jose Pablo Baraybar, the chief of the Office of Missing Persons and Forensics within UNMIK for five years, says: “There were people that are certainly alive that were in Kukes, in that camp, as prisoners. Those people saw other people there, both Albanians and non-Albanians. There were members of the KLA leadership going through that camp. Many names were mentioned, and I would say that that is an established fact.”

Baraybar tracked missing citizens in Kosovo and across the border in Albania.

Karin Limdal, spokeswoman for the EU rule of law mission in Kosovo, EULEX, told Balkan Insight that the mission is aware of the allegations concerning the Kukes case, and that prosecutors are looking at the evidence to see if they can bring indictments.

YELLOW MERCEDES OF DEATH

These grave allegations about the Kukes camp, in the north west of Albania, are based on interviews with several sources: two eyewitnesses – one former inmate and one member of the KLA, records from a cemetery in Albania and UN documents that we have gained access to, which detail the testimonies of people ill-treated in Kukes.

Together, they paint a portrait of a brutal prison regime that is at odds with the claims of former KLA leaders, who say they adhered to international human rights conventions and never detained civilians.

The abuses in Kukes may not have been isolated events. According to former KLA fighters who talked to us, as well as independent testimony provided to UN investigators, the KLA maintained a loose network of at least six secret jails in the dozen or so bases they operated in Albania and the two they had in Kosovo during and after the 1999 war.

Those jails were used for interrogations that routinely included torture, according to sources interviewed for this story.

Most former KLA soldiers we interviewed are proud of their war with the Serbian forces, whose bloody actions forced the mass flight of hundreds of thousands of Kosovo Albanians from their homes in 1999.

But some said they felt shamed by what some KLA commanders and leaders had done under the cover of war.

“It didn’t seem strange at the time,” one former KLA soldier, who witnessed the events, said. “But now, looking back, I know that some of the things that were done to innocent civilians were wrong. But the people who did those things act as if nothing happened, and continue to hurt their own people, Albanians.”

Another eyewitness, a Kosovo Albanian, says he was held at the KLA base in Kukes on the pretext of being a Serbian spy, an allegation he vehemently denies.

This man, who did not wish to be named, described witnessing KLA soldiers abusing and torturing prisoners at the base for weeks, often under the supervision of KLA officers.

“I saw people being beaten, stabbed, hit with batons,” he said. “I saw people left without food for five or six days. I saw coffins being thrown in graves. I’ve seen people killed.”

This man claimed most of the captives held at Kukes were non-combatant civilians, mainly Albanians accused of working for the regime, and some Roma. There were also some KLA soldiers, imprisoned for disciplinary measures.

According to both sources, three prisoners were Kosovo Albanian women. Two were Roma from Prizren. The rest were young Kosovo Albanian males, aged between 20 and 27, all accused of collaborating with Serbian forces. The inmate said he also heard shouts in Serbian from prisoners who were being tortured a short distance away from the compound.

The inmate said that he heard “people crying and yelling at being tortured, and I could specifically distinguish native Serbian being spoken there.”

He said some Kosovo Albanian prisoners were shot or beaten to death on the base, while others were driven off in a yellow Mercedes. One Kosovo Albanian prisoner died in front of him and five other inmates, after being shot in the calf by his interrogators and then left untreated.

The records of the cemetery in Kukes shed light on the man who died after being shot in the calf.

According to cemetery records, he was buried on June 6th 1999, four days before Serbian forces pulled out of Kosovo, in a plot reserved for Kosovo Albanians who died in Albania during the conflict ,.

“Every time I saw the yellow Mercedes, someone was taken in that car and then I would never see that person again,” he said. “They were never found.”

The same former inmate said he believed the people had been taken captive for various reasons, which included revenge and greed, as well as allegations that they were Serbian spies.

One prisoner had worked as a policeman in the western town of Gjakova/Djakovica under the Milosevic regime. He was taken away in the yellow Mercedes and has not been seen since.

Another had been a teacher, whose apparent offence was to have a license to carry a gun issued by the Serbian authorities.

The inmate said he believed that more than 25 people were held there from March to June 1999, from the start of the NATO bombing of the former Yugoslavia until NATO forces moved into Kosovo.

The inmates were mostly from the city of Prizren and surrounding villages. The KLA had apprehended them after waves of Kosovars entered Kukes during the NATO bombing. At least one was arrested as far away as Durres, or Lushnja, in central Albania, according to both sources.

Our source, who was an inmate, recalls another inmate, a Kosovo Albanian, yelling from the barred windows to the troops in the yard, telling them that if they killed him, he had six brothers who would avenge him. “What would you do about them?” he challenged them.

According to the same two sources, and UNMIK documents from their investigation into the case, some of the survivors were transferred in the aftermath of the war to detention cells at the police station in Prizren, in Kosovo.

On June 18th, they, and other people detained by the KLA in Prizren, were released by German KFOR troops, who stormed the building.

The same sources estimated that as many as 18 captives may have been killed in Kukes.
The source who was a member of the KLA said: “I understand that they had cooperated with the Serbs and had done a lot of harm. This would make people mad when one thinks of the massacres happening across the border. But their treatment was brutal. At times, I was sorry for them.”

The former inmate we spoke to was sceptical about whether any of the captives had actively collaborated with Serbian death squads.

“But even if they deserved punishment, no-one had the right to do that [torture] to someone [else],” he said. “No-one has the right to do such things to other human beings.”

A NETWORK OF CAMPS

Kukes was an important strategic location for the KLA. Weapons, uniforms, cash and fresh recruits all flowed through the warehouses and storage buildings at the site.

The base was also important for the KLA military police, which reportedly rounded up suspects from among the mass of civilians who fled to Albania, or were expelled by Serbian forces.

A unit of the Albanian army, stationed at the base in Kukes, assisted the KLA to set up its military police operations, according to several policemen we interviewed.

It appears that Kukes was one of many detention centres in Albania and Kosovo, and prisoners would be transferred from one to another.

Two captives were brought to Kukes from a similar KLA facility near the town of Burrel, where the KLA ran a barracks for training soldiers during the last two months of the war, said the former inmate.

“They told us about people being killed there, people put into lime pits there,” he said. “I could also see what was going on in Burrel from the state [in which] they were brought in… They’d been tortured badly.”

According to the UN documents, the interviews with KLA members and the inmate, other captives were transferred to Kukes from KLA facilities in at least two other places – Durres, and after the war, Prizren in Kosovo itself.

The KLA had intelligence units and military police in most bases they maintained in Albania.

Halil Katana, a military journalist from Tirana, in his authorised biography of Kudusi Lama, the commander of the Kukes division, ‘Kudusi Lama: War General’, writes: “Those units [of the KLA military police] played an important role in establishing the discipline in KLA groups trained in the Kukes area, and in seizing Serb agents who entered the country amongst refugees from Kosovo.”

These units maintained detainment cells in Babine, a logistics centre near the border region of Tropoja; in the training camp of Burrel and at a KLA base in Durres, according to our third source, another member of the KLA.

Bislim Zyrapi, currently an official at the Interior Ministry of Kosovo, was responsible for the KLA operations at the base in Kukes from early May to the end of the NATO bombing of the former Yugoslavia on June 10th.

He says that the people detained at the jail in Kukes were soldiers with disciplinary problems, and that there were no people killed at the base, or outside of it. But he added that he found the KLA in disarray, with armed soldiers and individuals who wandered freely in town and elsewhere in Albania. “One of the first things I had to do was to discipline them,” he said.
PERPETRATORS AT LARGE

According to eyewitnesses, two Albanian citizens involved with the KLA took part in these interrogations.

One man, described as having long black hair, was especially brutal to the Roma from Prizren, according to one source.

One source said KLA fighters coming back from fighting in Kosovo sometimes took out their rage on the inmates.

The other said the prisoners were tortured into admitting they had cooperated with the Serbian state security forces, UDBA. The interrogators wanted to record the prisoners confessing collaboration with the Serbs.

The same sources that witnessed the base in Kukes, told us that the interrogators in Kukes were KLA officers who had been involved in the capture of suspected collaborators.
Both our sources concerning the base, identified several KLA officers involved in the abuses at Kukes.

One of them is currently in a top position in the judicial system in Kosovo.

We have withheld names of the alleged perpetrators, so as not to endanger our sources.

Some men involved in the abuses at Kukes were also involved in abducting Kosovo citizens after the war, according to former KLA soldiers we interviewed.

Their targets were not Albanian ‘traitors’, but Serbs or Roma who had remained in Kosovo after NATO troops entered the territory.

One Kosovo Albanian who returned to fight in Kosovo after spending many years abroad, told us he saw nearly 30 Serbs and Roma held in a KLA camp in Baballoq/Babaloc, near Decan in western Kosovo, after the war, in summer 1999.

He said he heard screams from the location and assumed the inmates were being tortured. When NATO patrols passed through the area, the prisoners were hidden in a workhouse, the same source added.

This former KLA fighter said he suspects the group was taken over the border to Albania and killed. “I never saw them again, never read anything about them in the newspaper,” he said. “So they probably disappeared into the mountains.”

Source:  balkaninsight.com

Written by admin in: Uncategorized |
Mar
04
2009
0

KLA killed my father

Rade Dragovic on crimes against Serbs

Rade Dragovic recognized in a photograph showing the KLA rebels posing with a body of a killed man, his father Predrag Dragovic (1950) who disappeared on June 22, 1999 in the Town of Pec. He gave the statement to Serbia War crimes prosecution. The photograph was made in the north of Albania showing the commander of the KLA 128th brigade Agim Ramadani who was under Ramush Haradinaj’s command.

‘We fled to Montenegro while my father and his mother remained at our house. He said to have done no evil to anybody and have no reason to leave. He told us not to worry. On that 22nd day of June 1999 he went out to buy cigarettes and never returned home. In the photograph he is in uniform, but neither he nor anyone of the family took part in war conflict. We do not know if his body organs were removed from him’, Rade Dragovic said at press conference at the War crimes prosecution.
The prosecutor Vladimir Vukcevic believes that the KLA rebels have dressed Predrag Dragovic in uniform on purpose before killing him in order to hide killing of civilians.
‘We have identified the most probable executors of Dragovic. About ten of the KLA rebels who took part in killings in the north of Albania have been identified’, Vukcevic said.
ACCORDING TO HIS WORDS, THERE ARE FOUR LOCATIONS IN ALBANIA THAT THE PROSECUTION BELIEVES THAT THE BODY ORGANS WERE USED TO BE REMOVED FROM CAPTURED SERBS.
‘We do not know the exact number of victims but we know that about 300 non-Albanians have disappeared’, Bruno Vekaric, spokesman of the War crimes prosecution says.
Vukcevic said that the prosecution shall request again from Albania to cooperate in the investigation and if Albania refuses, the Prosecution shall address international institutions. At the end of March Vukcevic is to meet with Dick Marty, the EU special envoy for these issues. He is also to meet with the EULEX chief prosecutor soon.
According to Vekaric one witness has made a sketch of a house that was a private prison for civilians from Kosovo and Metohija where the KLA used to bring people. The prosecution has located that house in the Port of Drac.
The Prosecution has also got via its sources a complete UNMIK’s report over investigation of the ‘yellow house’ at Burrel in Albania. According to former chief prosecutor Carla Del Ponte it was the house in which the body organs were taken from the victims.

Source: blic.rs

Written by admin in: Uncategorized |
Jan
06
2009
0

We were finding bodies of killed Serbs every morning

Mauro Del Vecchio, former General of Italian Army in KiM

Rome – Mauro Del Vecchio, former General of Italian Army who led the unit of 7,000 soldiers that entered Kosovo in June of 1999 after end of NATO air strikes on Serbia told Italian ‘Panorama’ weekly that during the first three weeks of the mandate ‘reports on the found bodies of killed Serbs and Romas arrived on his table each morning’, but that was a taboo topic they were not allowed to speak about with journalists.

‘The killing continued later but not so frequently. Those that have not fled Kosovo were under permanent risk to be killed or raped. Deserted Serbian houses were leveled to the ground or set on fire. Albanians were attacking the churches and monasteries, too. Their goal was to erase every trace of the Serbian presence in Kosovo’, Del Vecchio said. Today he is representing the Democratic Party in the Italian Senate.
The ‘Panorama’ weekly published for the first time photographs of Serbian victims made by Italian soldiers in 1999.
‘Nobody was taking Serbian bodies that were left in all possible places. Mothers and wives of abducted Serbs were pleading for their dearest to be found, but the majority of them have never been found, not even those that were dead’, Del Vecchio said.
The Italian weekly reports as a ‘horrifying fact’ that 70 percent of the total number of abducted Kosovo Serbs had disappeared after June 1999 when the war was officially over.
The magazine has also come in possession of photographs that the UNMIK soldiers found in Decani in 2003 but has not published them because they were ‘horrific’. They show the KLA members smiling with a cut off head of a Serbian reservist. Another photograph shows them putting in a bag at least two cut off heads. It is also said that at the time when the photographs were made that was the zone under command of Ramush Haradinaj.


Kosovska Mitrovica – The health condition of injured firemen Marko Kisic and Bratislav Bozovic who sustained life injuries on Friday evening in an explosion while dealing with a fire is still serious and they are in intensive care of the hospital in Kosovska Mitrovica. Kisic is still in a critical condition.

www.blic.rs

Written by admin in: Uncategorized |
Dec
21
2008
0

Jeremic: Kosovo first, European integration second

Foreign Minister with parliamentary deputies
Author: E.B. | 12.12.2008 – 08:19


Serbia Foreign Minister Vuk Jeremic said today that ‘Serbia would interrupt further European integration if a condition of Kosovo and Metohija recognition would be set to it’.

He, however, pointed out not to believe that the EU would set such a condition addressing members of Foreign affairs board of Serbia Parliament. He referred to the fact that five EU countries have not recognized the southern province and that they do not intend to do so. ‘Conditions for stabilization and association can be changed only if approved by a consensus’, Jeremic added.

‘If such condition is set, Serbia shall have no other alternative but to say ‘no’ to further European integration processes’, the Foreign Minister said. He also explained that European integration and struggle for preservation of territorial integrity and sovereignty are to separate processes.

Source: www.blic.rs

Written by admin in: Uncategorized |
Dec
16
2008
0

75 year old grandmother beaten, strangled, kidnapped

The 75-year-old grandmother was strangled, punched, kicked, bound in duct tape and thrown in the trunk of her own car by three young adults. After 26 hours without food or water, Sandy Vinge made a silent plea to God: Either save me, or let me die.
“I told God that,” Vinge, her face still swollen and marked by ugly purple bruises, recalled to TODAY’s Matt Lauer. “Then I asked my late husband, who had just died — I said, ‘Don, tell God [to] help me.’ And he did. That night he helped me. The sheriffs came and they rescued me, because I wouldn’t have lasted long.”

Written by admin in: Uncategorized |

Powered by WordPress | Aeros Theme | TheBuckmaker.com WordPress Themes