Photobucket
Revisionism | Nordwave Florida
Dec
07
2009
0
Dec
05
2009
0

Quotes on Firearms Rights

The Founding Fathers and others on Gun Rights.

The Founding Fathers and others on Gun Rights.

Here are some of my favorite quotes on the right to bear arms. If you like these, surf over to my fortunes collection where you can download them in a couple of cookie files.

When only cops have guns, it’s called a “police state”.

Love your country, but never trust its government.

– Robert A. Heinlein.

“The power to tax involves the power to destroy;…the power to destroy may defeat and render useless the power to create….”

– Chief Justice John Marshall, 1819.

“Rightful liberty is unobstructed action, according to our will, within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others.”

– Thomas Jefferson

“No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government”

– Thomas Jefferson, 1 Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

“The very atmosphere of firearms anywhere and everywhere restrains evil interference – they deserve a place of honor with all that’s good”

– George Washington

“The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed.”

– Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers at 184-188

“Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the act of depriving a whole nation of arms, as the blackest.”

– Mahatma Gandhi

“They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”

– Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759.

“Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when the government’s purposes are beneficient… The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well meaning but without understanding.”

– Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis

“Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Tolerance in the face of tyranny is no virtue.”

– Barry Goldwater

“I hold it, that a little rebellion, now and then, is a good thing, and as necessary in the political world as storms in the physical.”

– Thomas Jefferson, Letter to James Madison, January 30, 1787

The people of the various provinces are strictly forbidden to have in their possession any swords, short swords, bows, spears, firearms, or other types of arms. The possession of unnecessary implements makes difficult the collection of taxes and dues and tends to foment uprisings.

– Toyotomi Hideyoshi, Shogun, August 1588

“This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it or their revolutionary right to dismember it or overthrow it.”

– Abraham Lincoln, 4 April 1861

“One of the ordinary modes, by which tyrants accomplish their purposes without resistance, is, by disarming the people, and making it an offense to keep arms.”

– Constitutional scholar Joseph Story, 1840

“The bearing of arms is the essential medium through which the individual asserts both his social power and his participation in politics as a responsible moral being…”

– J.G.A. Pocock, describing the beliefs of the founders of the U.S.

Men trained in arms from their infancy, and animated by the love of liberty, will afford neither a cheap or easy conquest.

– From the Declaration of the Continental Congress, July 1775.

“As to the species of exercise, I advise the gun. While this gives [only] moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise, and independence to the mind. Games played with the ball and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun, therefore, be the constant companion to your walks.”

– Thomas Jefferson, writing to his teenaged nephew.

No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.

– 16 Am. Jur. Sec. 177 late 2d, Sec 256

“The state calls its own violence `law’, but that of the individual `crime’”

– Max Stirner

“Taking my gun away because I might shoot someone is like cutting my tongue out because I might yell `Fire!’ in a crowded theater.”

– Peter Venetoklis

…Virtually never are murderers the ordinary, law-abiding people against whom gun bans are aimed. Almost without exception, murderers are extreme aberrants with lifelong histories of crime, substance abuse, psychopathology, mental retardation and/or irrational violence against those around them, as well as other hazardous behavior, e.g., automobile and gun accidents.”

– Don B. Kates, writing on statistical patterns in gun crime

“Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom.”

– John F. Kennedy

The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them.”

– Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story of the John Marshall Court

“Government is not reason, it is not eloquence, it is force; like fire, a troublesome servant and a fearful master. Never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action.”

– George Washington, in a speech of January 7, 1790

“A militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves … and include all men capable of bearing arms.”

– Senator Richard Henry Lee, 1788, on “militia” in the 2nd Amendment

“…quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est.” [...a sword never kills anybody; it's a tool in the killer's hand.]

– (Lucius Annaeus) Seneca “the Younger” (ca. 4 BC-65 AD),

False is the idea of utility that sacrifices a thousand real advantages for one imaginary or trifling inconvenience; that would take fire from men because it burns, and water because one may drown in it; that has no remedy for evils except destruction. The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.

– Cesare Beccaria, as quoted by Thomas Jefferson’s Commonplace book

No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave.

– “Political Disquisitions”, a British republican tract of 1774-1775

The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions, that I wish it always to be kept alive. It will often be exercised when wrong, but better so than not to be exercised at all. I like a little rebellion now and then. It is like a storm in the Atmosphere.

– Thomas Jefferson, letter to Abigail Adams, 1787

& what country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not warned from time to time that his people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms.

– Thomas Jefferson, letter to Col. William S. Smith, 1787

“Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect every one who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined.”

– Patrick Henry, speech of June 5 1788

Are we at last brought to such a humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our own defence? Where is the difference between having our arms in our own possession and under our own direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defence be the *real* object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands?

– Patrick Henry, speech of June 9 1788

“To disarm the people… was the best and most effectual way to enslave them.”

– George Mason, speech of June 14, 1788

“The great object is, that every man be armed. [...] Every one who is able may have a gun.”

– Patrick Henry, speech of June 14 1788

Such are a well regulated militia, composed of the freeholders, citizen and husbandman, who take up arms to preserve their property, as individuals, and their rights as freemen.

– “M.T. Cicero”, in a newspaper letter of 1788 touching the “militia” referred to in the Second Amendment to the Constitution.

That the said Constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the press or the rights of conscience; or to prevent the people of the United states who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms…

– Samuel Adams, in “Phila. Independent Gazetteer”, August 20, 1789

The danger (where there is any) from armed citizens, is only to the *government*, not to *society*; and as long as they have nothing to revenge in the government (which they cannot have while it is in their own hands) there are many advantages in their being accustomed to the use of arms, and no possible disadvantage.

– Joel Barlow, “Advice to the Privileged Orders”, 1792-93

[The disarming of citizens] has a double effect, it palsies the hand and brutalizes the mind: a habitual disuse of physical forces totally destroys the moral [force]; and men lose at once the power of protecting themselves, and of discerning the cause of their oppression.

– Joel Barlow, “Advice to the Privileged Orders”, 1792-93

A man who has nothing which he is willing to fight for, nothing which he cares about more than he does about his personal safety, is a miserable creature who has no chance of being free, unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself.

– John Stuart Mill, writing on the U.S. Civil War in 1862

You need only reflect that one of the best ways to get yourself a reputation as a dangerous citizen these days is to go about repeating the very phrases which our founding fathers used in the great struggle for independence.

– Attributed to Charles Austin Beard (1874-1948)

Every Communist must grasp the truth, ‘Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.’

– Mao Tse-tung, 1938, inadvertently endorsing the Second Amendment.

In the absence of any evidence tending to show that possession or use of a ’shotgun having a barrel of less than eighteen inches in length’ at this time has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia, we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument. [...] The Militia comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense.

– Majority Supreme Court opinion in “U.S. vs. Miller” (1939)

An armed society is a polite society. Manners are good when one may have to back up his acts with his life.

– Robert A. Heinlein, “Beyond This Horizon”, 1942

The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to permit the conquered Eastern peoples to have arms. History teaches that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by doing so.

– Hitler, April 11 1942

The right to buy weapons is the right to be free.

– A.E. Van Vogt, “The Weapon Shops Of Isher”, ASF December 1942

Rifles, muskets, long-bows and hand-grenades are inherently democratic weapons. A complex weapon makes the strong stronger, while a simple weapon — so long as there is no answer to it — gives claws to the weak.

– George Orwell, “You and the Atom Bomb”, 1945

Certainly one of the chief guarantees of freedom under any government, no matter how popular and respected, is the right of the citizens to keep and bear arms. [...] the right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary government and one more safeguard against a tyranny which now appears remote in America, but which historically has proved to be always possible.

– Hubert H. Humphrey, 1960

No matter how one approaches the figures, one is forced to the rather startling conclusion that the use of firearms in crime was very much less when there were no controls of any sort and when anyone, convicted criminal or lunatic, could buy any type of firearm without restriction. Half a century of strict controls on pistols has ended, perversely, with a far greater use of this weapon in crime than ever before.

– Colin Greenwood, in the study “Firearms Control”, 1972

Let us hope our weapons are never needed –but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government — and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws.”

– Edward Abbey, “Abbey’s Road”, 1979

If I were to select a jack-booted group of fascists who are perhaps as large a danger to American society as I could pick today, I would pick BATF [the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms].

– U.S. Representative John Dingell, 1980

.. a government and its agents are under no general duty to provide public services, such as police protection, to any particular individual citizen…

– Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 (D.C. App.181)

The conclusion is thus inescapable that the history, concept, and wording of the second amendment to the Constitution of the United States, as well as its interpretation by every major commentator and court in the first half-century after its ratification, indicates that what is protected is an individual right of a private citizen to own and carry firearms in a peaceful manner.

– Report of the Subcommittee On The Constitution of the Committee On The Judiciary, United States Senate, 97th Congress, second session (February, 1982), SuDoc# Y4.J 89/2: Ar 5/5

In recent years it has been suggested that the Second Amendment protects the “collective” right of states to maintain militias, while it does not protect the right of “the people” to keep and bear arms. If anyone entertained this notion in the period during which the Constitution and the Bill of Rights were debated and ratified, it remains one of the most closely guarded secrets of the eighteenth century, for no known writing surviving from the period between 1787 and 1791 states such a thesis.

– Stephen P. Halbrook, “That Every Man Be Armed”, 1984

To make inexpensive guns impossible to get is to say that you’re putting a money test on getting a gun. It’s racism in its worst form.

– Roy Innis, president of the Congress of Racial Equality (CORE), 1988

I don’t like the idea that the police department seems bent on kepping a pool of unarmed victims available for the predations of the criminal class.

– David Mohler, 1989, on being denied a carry permit in NYC

Americans have the will to resist because you have weapons. If you don’t have a gun, freedom of speech has no power.

– Yoshimi Ishikawa, Japanese author, in the LA Times 15 Oct 1992

You know why there’s a Second Amendment? In case the government fails to follow the first one.

– Rush Limbaugh, in a moment of unaccustomed profundity 17 Aug 1993

The whole of the Bill [of Rights] is a declaration of the right of the people at large or considered as individuals… It establishes some rights of the individual as unalienable and which consequently, no majority has a right to deprive them of.

– Albert Gallatin, Oct 7 1789

“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.

– John F. Kennedy

http://www.catb.org/~esr/guns/quotes.html

Nov
22
2009
1

70s film on private Hitler rediscovered-Swastika


When “Swastika” was shown at the 1973 Cannes film festival, fights broke out and somebody threw part of a chair at the screen.“All hell broke loose,” says the film’s Australian-born, Los Angeles-based director Phillipe Mora. “There were eruptions all through the theatre. Finally they stopped the film and a French guy came out, looking like a head waiter and said, ‘Ladies and gentlemen, this is the Cannes film festival, not a beer hall.” The cause of the ruckus was, primarily, that the film appeared to humanise Adolf Hitler and his inner circle. Never-seen-before colour footage, shot mostly by Hitler’s mistress Eva Braun, showed the personification of evil cuddling his dog, playing with children and discussing “Gone with the Wind.”

The revival of “Swastika,” championed by the German documentary director Ilona Ziok, is a sign, Mora says, that Germany has matured in how it handles its Nazi legacy. After the Berlin screening, a German film producer effusively told Mora, a Jew whose father was born in Leipzig, that “Swastika” should be shown in every school. It’s a far cry from its reception in 1973. Three decades before films such as “Downfall” began breaking the taboo against exploring the human side of the Nazis, Mora’s film provoked outrage.

“The film was made under the assumption that everybody knew Hitler was a monster and a murderer. I didn’t realise it was open to debate,” he says. “But he was a man with a mother and a father and sisters and a pet dog. And that viscerally disturbed people. They had only seen Hitler ranting and raving in grainy black and white film. It took 30 years but now a new generation is interested.”

Lost at the Pentagon

Mora went to the Pentagon, which found the eight cans of film and happily handed them over.  “We were just dumbfounded,” he recalls. “Here was this incredible footage that’d just been sitting there because no one had asked for it.”More > > >

Nov
09
2009
0

Italy: Holocaust-Denying Academic Sparks Row

If we don’t believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don’t believe in it at all.  ~Noam Chomsky

The Holocaust denying views of an Italian academic at the University of Rome ‘La Sapienza’, Antonio Caracciolo, has sparked calls for him to resign. The 59-year-old philosophy of law researcher’s blogs have described the World War II Nazi Holocaust – or extermination of six million Jews – as “a legend” and claim the gas chambers “are one of many ‘truths’ which need to be verified.”

The head of Rome’s Jewish community, Riccardo Pacifici, said it will take legal action against the academic.

In 2007, Italy’s previous centre-left government, headed by Romano Prodi, passed a law making Holocaust denial a crime.

“We are waiting for the university to take measures to protect students and will certainly be taking action against Caracciolo,” Pacifici said. (Protect students from what? — Ed.)

“We are confident the university won’t be the only institution to act and that the whole of civil society will react.”

The rector of ‘La Sapienza’, Luigi Frati has announced the university “will consider taking disciplinary action” against Caracciolo, without giving any further details.

“He would do well to visit Dachau, which I visited when I was 16, or if he can’t manage that, the Ardeatine Caves,” said Frati.

He was referring to the former Nazi concentration camp in southern Germany and to the notorious World War II massacre of 333 Italian civilians in Rome by Nazi troops.

Rome’s mayor Gianni Alemanno has stated his opposition to university lecturers with such views. “I don’t think a professor who holds Holocaust-denying views can teach at ‘La Sapienza,” he stated.

The president of the Lazio region surrounding Rome, Piero Marazzo, and of the Province of Rome, Nicola Zingaretti condemned Caracciolo’s views.

‘La Sapienza’ professors and students also expressed shock and dismay at the content of Caracciolo’s blogs.

The head of the Political Science Faculty, where Caracciolo teaches, Gianluigi Rossi, said it was “a very bad day”. Social sciences undergraduate Massimo, from Florence, described Caracciolo’s Holocaust-denying views as “extremely serious.”

Caracciolo has denied he is a “historical revisionist” and says he believes in freedom of thought and expression which are guaranteed under the Italian constitution.

It is not the first time that an Italian academic has expressed such views. In November last year, Roberto Valvo, a high-school history teacher was suspended after he claimed there was “no proof” of the Holocaust.

In May 2007, authorities barred a visit to Italy by the French Holocaust denying historian Robert Faurisson, on the invitation of Claudio Moffa, a lecturer at the Univerity of Teramo in Italy’s central Abruzzo region.

The move came after heated protests from Italy’s Jewish community. Caracciolo had defended the planned debate.

Source

Written by admin in: International News, Revisionism |
Oct
21
2009
0

Holocaust denier sues survivor, calling Auschwitz memoir vicious lies’


Hunt, 25, of Archbald, Pa. filed the libel suit in Broward Circuit Court on Oct. 6 and is demanding a jury trial and punitive damages of “not less than $60 million.”    “Zisblatt blatantly stole other Jewish people’s experiences during World War II and passed them off as her own in order to further the Jewish political agenda and profit off of these fantastical tales,” Hunt, who is representing himself without an attorney, wrote in his lawsuit. “The defendants must not go unpunished for tormenting Gentiles and instilling hatred in Jews using such hideous lies.”

In 2007, Hunt accosted Holocaust survivor and scholar Wiesel, 81, in a San Francisco hotel elevator in an alleged attempt to force Wiesel to recant his own recollections of the Holocaust.

Hunt was convicted in 2008 of false imprisonment, battery and elder abuse.

A notorious Holocaust denier convicted of attacking Nobel Peace Prize winner Elie Wiesel in an elevator has now set his sights on an 80-year-old Pembroke Pines, Fla., woman whose memoir recounts her ordeal in the Auschwitz-Birkenau death camp.

In a lawsuit filed in Broward Circuit Court, Eric Hunt alleges that the “The Fifth Diamond: The Story of Irene Weisberg Zisblatt” is full of “vicious lies” and “fantastical tales” that turn Jews into haters and torment non-Jews.

“This lunatic has assaulted a survivor in the past,” Stuart Mermelstein of Miami said, “and is posing a danger to my mother-in-law simply for speaking out and writing a book.”

Zisblatt’s autobiography recounts how she, five siblings and their parents were packed into a boxcar for the trip from Hungary to the extermination camp. Zisblatt, who appeared in director Steven Spielberg’s 1999 Academy Award-winning documentary “The Last Days,” was the only member of her family to survive World War II. The precious stones she hid are still in her family.

The case has been assigned to Circuit Judge Peter Weinstein.More

Oct
07
2009
0

David Irving Coming To Florida Oct. 25-Nov. 2

Oct. 25th Jacksonville Sunday 7pm.

Oct. 26th Monday Orlando 7pm.

Oct. 28th Wednesday 1pm luncheon Melbourne.

Oct. 28th Wednesday 7pm West Palm Beach.

Oct. 29th Thursday 7pm Miami.

Nov, 2nd Clearwater Monday 7pm.

THIS fall, David Irving tours the eastern and southern United States, with a fascinating talk on writing Real History on the basis of the Japanese and Nazi messages decoded by the British in WW2. Advance booking is necessary.

At these talks, David Irving will informally meet friends and sign his books. He will have with him copies of his prison memoirs, Banged Up, the first book to appear from his pen for six years. Banged Up describes a piece of his own history – how he was invited to speak to students in Vienna in 2005, lured into an ambush by the Austrian secret state police, arrested at gunpoint by eight cops, charged under the country’s archaic but useful Stalin-era law prohibiting the Nazi Party, and held in solitary confinement in the country’s oldest prison for fourteen months until an appeal judge ordered his immediate release. And even then the authorities held him for another twenty-four hours, while a complaisant judge tried to get a new charge sealed against him for speaking with the BBC, an “offence” under section 3(h) of Austria’s Prohibition Act, carrying a prison sentence of twenty years to life.

Plus ça change, comments Mr Irving: “Things are not changing in Europe, they are reverting.”

This amusing but disturbing short book starts and ends with two “teasers” – chapters from his own full-length autobiography on which the author is working alongside the third volume of his war biography of Winston Churchill and a thought-provoking portrait of the brief (forty-four year) life of SS chief Heinrich Himmler. Both are based on unknown diaries and materials – the hallmark of author Irving’s widely reviewed and best-selling works in the past.

In the interests of all: To ensure that private functions such as these run smoothly and cover costs, there is a nominal registration charge of about fifteen dollars reduced to about twelve dollars each for two persons or more; for functions including a full dinner (e.g. Atlanta), the combined charge is about seventy-five dollars (about sixty for two persons or more). Credit cards are charged in US dollars as “Focal Point Publications”. Please note that absolutely no applicants will be accepted without prior registration here, and that the name must match that of the cardholder.

Final information will be provided in good time and only upon receipt of this registration.
We reserve the right to refuse admission. Unauthorized photography and recording are not permitted. Journalists attend only by special invitation.
We operate a no-quibble refund policy in the event of cancellation or a genuine inability to attend.
Those wishing to buy Mr Irving’s books can offer credit or debit cards, checks, and cash in any currency. To buy Banged Up, click the image above.

Thank you: Focal Point Publications, Windsor, England

REGISTER HERE

Written by admin in: Florida News, Revisionism, USA News | Tags: ,
Sep
28
2009
0

Where in the World is Hitler’s Skull?

A skull long believed to be that of Adolf Hitler actually belonged to a woman, according to an American scientist who has taken DNA samples from it.

The skull was taken by Soviet forces in 1945 when they found charred remains outside the Nazi dictator’s bunker in Berlin.

The Russians said at the time that the findings backed claims that Hitler had shot himself on April 30, 1945, and then been cremated along with his wife, Eva Braun.

Now, however, archaeologist and bone specialist Nick Bellantoni says the skull really belonged to a woman aged under 40 and not Hitler – who was 56 when he died.

Neither does Mr Bellantoni believe the skull belongs to Braun, Hitler’s long-time girlfriend and last-minute wife, who is thought to have killed herself by taking cyanide and would therefore not have had a bullet wound – as this skull has.

The Russians say they have never claimed the skull itself was the chief reason for their belief the skull was Hitler’s.

Instead, they point to dental records as confirmation that Hitler killed himself.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,556343,00.html?test=latestnews

Written by admin in: Hitler, International News, NS, Revisionism |
Sep
15
2009
0

School Bus beating police think it may be a racial thing.


Belleville police are investigating the alleged beating of a 17-year-old boy on a school bus Monday morning.

Police received a complaint of a battery that happened on a bus on the way to Belleville West High School. Police said the white male student was beaten by two black male students. Video of the beating was captured on the bus video camera.

Investigators said that the victim was attempting to find a seat on the bus and was told by two students he could not sit down next to them. When he did sit down, one suspect attempted to push him out of his seat then began punching him in the face and choking him.

Police said the victim again sat down in his seat and after a few minutes of another student taunting him verbally, the second suspect walked over to the victim and began striking him in the face. One of the alleged attackers is 14 and the other 15.

“It’s just a sad, sad state I mean what are our kids learning that they behave like this,” said Belleville Police Captain Donald Sax.

Belleville police believe the fight may have been racially motivated. “We certainly believe by looking at the video that race had some factor in it.. yes,” said Sax.More News

Sep
14
2009
0

It’s Official – No Shortage Of Holocaust Survivors

It’s now official – no actual shortage of Holocaust survivors
‘The Israeli Prime Minister’s office recently put the number of “living Holocaust survivors” at nearly a million’ (extract from The Holocaust Industry by Norman G. Finkelstein of the City University of New York, published by Verso, London and New York, 2000,p.83).
(Google “holocaust survivor” gives 1,710,000 items)
See Wikipedia article: List of Holocaust survivors    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Holocaust_survivors  quote:
“There are many famous Holocaust survivors who survived the Nazi genocides in Europe and went on to achievements of great fame and notability. Those listed here were, at the very least, residents of the parts of Europe occupied by the Axis powers during World War II who survived until the end of the Holocaust (and the war). The majority of these people survived incarceration in theNazi concentration camps, but that is not strictly necessary for the purposes of this list…”
Statement by Richard Lynn, Professor Emeritus
University of Ulster, December 5, 2005
“I’ve checked out Churchill’s Second World War and the statement is quite correct – not a single mention of Nazi ‘gas chambers,’ a ‘genocide’ of the Jews, or of ’six million’ Jewish victims of the war.
Eisenhower’s Crusade in Europe is a book of 559 pages; the six volumes of Churchill’s Second World War total 4,448 pages; andDe Gaulle’s three-volume Mémoires de guerre is 2,054 pages.
In this mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages (not including the introductory parts), published from 1948 to 1959, one will find no mention either of Nazi ‘gas chambers,’ a ‘genocide’ of the Jews, or of ’six million’ Jewish victims of the war.”

http://www.rense.com/general87/hlo.htm

Sep
13
2009
0

Challenge to the US Holocaust Memorial Museum

Dear Subscriber and Supporter:

Would you like to see the below advertisement (it’s new) run in student newspapers on college campus from one end of America to the other? Do you want to encourage students to begin to ask their professors for the name of one person, “with proof,” who was killed in a gas chamber at Auschwitz?

By running this ad in student newspapers we will reach, accumulatively, tens of thousands of professors and their administrators, and hundreds of thousands of students. If you looked at this ad here last month you will see that I have rewritten the headline and edited the text. At the same time, the core question remains what it was—“one person, with proof.”

As an increasing number of students become familiar with this question, an increasing number of academics and others who front for the Holocaust Marketing Industry (HMI) will have special reasons to be concerned for the taboo they have so sedulously promoted to prohibit a free exchange of ideas on the matter.

This is not a fly-by-night campaign that I just thought up, but one that began in February 2008 when I addressed a letter to the spokeswoman for the HMI, Emory Professor Deborah Lipstadt, asking her for “one person, with proof. . . .” The question is simple, direct, and so dangerous that she can not even reference it publicly, much less try to answer it. It is a campaign that is not locked into one presentation, but can develop with events.

Each insertion of this ad will cost on average $175 — $250 and more. Please contribute what you can afford, what makes sense to you. If you know someone who knows someone, ask him or her to cover the costs of running the ad multiple times.

Once the ad is running, you will be able to follow the story on my One Person with Proof blog.

VINCENT REYNOUARD

CONTINUING THE STRUGGLE

It remains to be hoped that a change will intervene.

But for Providence to suscitate this, we must demonstrate we are worthy of this, that is to say to be ready for the momentwhen the upheaval arrives.

And to be ready !

The activists must remain in the first line [in the first row at the 'front'] in the struggle against the lie.

For my part, I will not desert my post.

Never!

For truth, for the memory of the calumniated ,vanquished [Germans and pro-Axis Frenchmen, Brits, Italians, Dutch, Slavs, etc.], for my children, for all the children, for Europe and for God.

I will go all the way — and to the very end.

http://vho-france.webs.com

http://csvr.wordpress.com

Powered by WordPress | Aeros Theme | TheBuckmaker.com WordPress Themes