Nordwave Great Britain

June 21, 2009 marks the 68th anniversary of Operation Barbarossa in which National Socialist forces from many nations in Europe under the leadership of Adolf Hitler invaded the Communists of the USSR. For the first year and a half they were destroying the Red death but when the United States entered the war on the side of the Communist butchers and atheists the tide turned against the White Race and National Socialism.

We salute the brave White men and women who took part in this giant effort to rid the world of Communism and the Jewish deranged and unnatural mindset that Communism is a symptom of. The Communists had plans to conquer the world for the twisted worldview of Communism. After they secured power in Russia and its surrounding countries they were focused on winning power in Germany. Once Germany fell all of Europe would then follow with the US close behind. The only thing that stopped them was Adolf Hitler and National Socialism! We are all greatly indebted to Adolf Hitler and all the brave and intelligent National Socialists who took part in Operation Barbarossa! (A great book that I believe you can find at amazon.com is Twilight of the Gods by former Swedish Waffen SS Man Thorolf Hillblad. It’s an incredible read and really wakes you up to the lies of the allies!)

The National Socialist Movement carries on the eternal natural struggle for our beautiful Aryan People.

When army group north was at the gates of Moscow December 1941 and the Wermacht and SS recon squads could see the spheres of the Kremlin in the far distance the dreaded Russian winter set in, the same kind of cold and snow  that stopped Napoleons invasion in the last century. The Germans beleived with good reason the Russians were almost beaten. They had captured millions of Russian prisoners in the summer campaign and thought the Russians could have no more reinforcements. But unknown to the Germans  Stalins extensive excellent spy net work in the far east Richard Sorge a Soviet spy in Japan let the Red intelligence organization know the Japanese were not going to attack the Russians on their eastern flanks at this time. This let Stalin turn  loose several well equipped Siberian Divisions used to the extreme weather that he had kept in reserve for such an occasion. Even though the Germans were surprised by this massive reinforcement and  not well equiped for this severe winter fighting they gave a good account of them selves. The old saying the German soldier  is invincible in defense has much truth to it. During this time of extreme adversity on the German soldier such was the strength and charisma and belief in  their leader Adolf Hitler that rumours abounded that he was actually physically there and had been seen dressed in disguise in a privates uniform passing ammunition and actually fighting with his troops. This helped steel the Germans and they held their positions for the most part thus preventing a route that had destroyed Napoleon from his retreat from Moscow mentioned above.

When Lenin was on his death bed Stalin, Beria and other high communists were at his side. They all beleived and knew europe would never peacefully accept the ever  expansive Soviet system and knew the europeans could only be coerced by the firy destructive sword of Soviet communism using Soviet bayonets. At that time they made their permanent foreign policy to encourage the western democracies to war against each other then “in the name of Soviet peace and saviour” the Russians would march west to beaches of Normandy with the democracies bled white from war with each other they would have no serious obstacles to stop them. America, naive with the criminal FDR appointed president never could see the deadly threat to the europeans, FDR who actually gave in to every Soviet demand without reciprocation, made fun of by his own cabinet that helped make foreign policy, could not and would not make an effort to stop them. By the time this danger was recognized Soviet power and the Russian language would be spoken from Asia to Warsaw to Cologne to Paris. Churchill, and  the French and Americans were never that politically sophisticated to the point to be aware  to see Soviet power was the murderous serpent it truly was. Due to “subversive ethnic influence and espionage in their own govts” and jealousy of the Germans successes their tunnel vision could only see the Germans as enemies. As has been said before and europeans will only grudgingly admit it if at all, it is only through the sacrifice and deaths of millions of German and their allies soldiers that they dont speak Russian as a major language on the continent of europe. Some day when real history is taught this will be recognized and these heroes will be revered as quite a few of us do now. The lie that was perpetuated that a unaware peacefull Soviet nation was attacked with out reason or provication is a Soviet fabrication. Russian offensive act s such as having massive airborne armored and infantry formations close to their borders bring this out. Russian historians now admit that an attack was planned not later than August 1941, the Germans seeing this danger and being directly in the path of the Soviet beast,  beat them to the punch by a short time,  and if not for degeneracy of western govts helping the Soviets would have annhilated this beast. 

Here’s a particularly forlorn historical date: Almost 90 years ago, between the 19th and 20th of December 1917, in the midst of the Bolshevik revolution and civil war, Lenin signed a decree calling for the establishment of The All-Russian Extraordinary Commission for Combating Counter-Revolution and Sabotage, also known as Cheka. Within a short period of time, Cheka became the largest and cruelest state security organization. Its organizational structure was changed every few years, as were its names: From Cheka to GPU, later to NKVD, and later to KGB.

 We cannot know with certainty the number of deaths Cheka was responsible for in its various manifestations, but the number is surely at least 20 million, including victims of the forced collectivization, the hunger, large purges, expulsions, banishments, executions, and mass death at Gulags.

 Whole population strata were eliminated: Independent farmers, ethnic minorities, members of the bourgeoisie, senior officers, intellectuals, artists, labor movement activists, “opposition members” who were defined completely randomly, and countless members of the Communist party itself.

 In his new, highly praised book “The War of the World, “Historian Niall Ferguson writes that no revolution in the history of mankind devoured its children with the same unrestrained appetite as did the Soviet revolution. In his book on the Stalinist purges, Tel Aviv University’s Dr. Igal Halfin writes that Stalinist violence was unique in that it was directed internally.

 Lenin, Stalin, and their successors could not have carried out their deeds without wide-scale cooperation of disciplined “terror officials,” cruel interrogators, snitches, executioners, guards, judges, perverts, and many bleeding hearts who were members of the progressive Western Left and were deceived by the Soviet regime of horror and even provided it with a kosher certificate.

All these things are well-known to some extent or another, even though the former Soviet Union’s archives have not yet been fully opened to the public. But who knows about this? But who knows about this? Within Russia itself, very few people have been brought to justice for their crimes in the NKVD’s and KGB’s service. The Russian public discourse today completely ignores the question of “How could it have happened to us?” As opposed to Eastern European nations, the Russians did not settle the score with their Stalinist past.

http://www.ynet.co.il/english/articles/0,7340,L-3342999,00.html

A Jewish group in Ukraine is objecting to a criminal case brought over the “Great Famine” committed in the 1930s.

The nation’s security service is pressing the case against a list of former Soviet officials accused of committing the Holodomor, which caused the deaths of millions in Ukraine in 1932-33. Most of the names on the list were Jewish.

Ukrainian lawmaker Aleksandr Feldman, leader of the Ukrainian Jewish Committee, said last week that it was “a farce” to press the case.

“All organizers of the Great Famine are dead,” he said.

Last July, the Ukrainian Security Service released a list of high-ranking Soviet state and Communist Party officials — as well as officials from NKVD, the police force of Soviet Russia — that essentially blamed Jews and Latvians responsible for perpetrating and executing the famine because most of the names on the list were Jewish.

The Ukrainian Jewish Committee called on the secret service to revise the list, which incited interethnic hatred, in order to clear up the “inaccuracy.”

Feldman believes there is a danger that the “Holodomor Affair” materials are being used for political purposes.

In late May, security service head Valentin Nalivaychenko claimed at a meeting with representatives of the World Congress of Ukrainians that “Ukraine has collected enough evidence to bring a criminal case regarding the famine, which was artificially created by the Bolshevik regime and caused mass death of citizens.”

Through the World Congress of Ukrainians, Nalivaychenko turned to leading foreign lawyers with a request to help find out the circumstances connected with preparing and committing the genocide. 
 

http://jta.org/news/article/2009/06/15/1005888/jewish-group-objects-to-holodomor-lawsuit

An excellent article courtesy of natfront.com:

Nicholas Soames is peeved because American author Nicholson Baker has written about events in Winston Churchill’s life that the family would rather keep hushed up. The author, whose book has been praised in America, tells of a memo sent by Churchill in 1920, when as Minister for War he wrote that he advocated drastic action against rebels in Iraq, saying “I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas.”

The author also cites an example of Churchill’s inhumanity, when during the Second World War he said “One of our great aims is the delivery on German towns of the largest quantity of bombs per night.” One could also cite how Churchill failed to evacuate the City of Coventry when he knew beforehand the night on which it was to be heavily bombed, or how he sent hundreds of Canadian soldiers over a ridge to a certain death, straight on to German guns. This order prompted Adolf Hitler to write in his diary, something to the effect of, “I cannot understand the inhumanity of the man.”

The British public, angry at Churchill’s warmongering, ditched him at the earliest opportunity. That time came when he was heavily defeated at the first post-war general election. But enough of the past for the moment. What of the current Churchill family?

Although a long-term sitting MP and one-time Minister for the Armed Forces, what exactly has Nicholas Soames, Winston Churchill’s grandson, contributed to the defence of our nation over the past forty years? Precisely nothing! He has sat back, living a life of luxury, watching as Britain has been invaded by hordes of aliens. He has presided over our loss of sovereignty and passively watched as our homeland has been turned into something akin to a violent third-world hell-hole from which thousands of Britons are desperate to escape. As an ex-defence Minister he should know something of the military. Much to his shame, he did nothing to prevent our armed forces from being illegally deployed in the Balkans, Iraq and Afghanistan.

Winston Churchill, another grandson spoke of a collection of pygmies trying to knock Churchill off his pedestal. Despite the media hype, Churchill was never regarded by most troops as the great hero he has been made out to be. Many regular soldiers had no time for him, but they did respect Field Marshall Bernard Montgomery. At least he was prepared to join them in the thick of battle. Parents often name their children after people they admire. There are many boys from the wartime generation named Bernard, but there doesn’t appear to be one called Winston. The only Winston’s anyone encounters seem to be West Indians.

Around twelve years ago, the younger Winston Churchill raised a warning about the lengthy queues of immigrants waiting to get into the UK. Immediately, a large amount of money from public funds was awarded to him for some documents belonging to his famous grandfather. It seemed unlikely there would be any of Winston’s documents that had not already been examined and copied. Unable to judge the situation, many nationalists decided to watch and wait. If he never broached the subject of immigration again, it could be surmised he had been bought off. Well, judge for yourself. He hasn’t raised the subject since.

Apart from leading Europe into a war from which it has never properly recovered, Winston Churchill’s second great crime was making Communism appear respectable to a large percentage of the middle classes. This he did by making a friend and ally of the mass-murderer and Soviet dictator, Joseph Stalin. Churchill also enlisted the help of thousands of Communist thugs whom he used to silence the English anti-war movement. Those anti-British Communist groups, mainly aliens, have been turned into heroes by the left-wing media.

Many of the anti-war protesters were fine men who had fought gallantly in the First World War. They bitterly regretted the high cost in European lives that resulted from that pointless conflict. It was these knowledgeable, courageous and patriotic men and women who should have been governing Britain. Instead, the anti-British and anti-European alliance had many hundreds of our finest men arrested and sent to jail, with neither a charge made against them or the possibility of a trial. No doubt the warmongers were prompted into this act of treachery by Joseph Stalin.

Throughout the post-war period, intellectuals, students, liberals and, it seems almost the entire establishment have developed an unhealthy belief in Communism. As a result, the anti-white programme they have propounded has reduced our once-great nation to a shadow of its former self. The permanent damage that Winston Churchill did to Europe and the wider world is enormous, far beyond the comprehension of most people.
Churchill never was the conservative saviour of Britain that those who wrote the history books would have us believe. He was a life-long liberal with close connections to the most scurrilous international financiers, including Bernard Baruch. It was for them that he railroaded Europe into war, and for them that he championed the Zionist/Communist cause. Today the world is ruled by anti white European, and anti-Christian organisations, and more than anyone it was Winston Churchill who gave them that power.

As the Second World War was drawing to a close the “warleader” had sleepless nights worrying over the fact that he had been responsible for the growth of the Soviet menace. True, Winston Churchill was the first public figure to warn of “an iron curtain descending over Europe”. But then he had spent enough time agonising over the advances the Soviet Union and global red menace had been able to make, due to his help.

Since 1939 it has been claimed that our parents and grandparents went to war to defend their country. They did nothing of the kind. Winston Churchill acted as a front man for various self-interested groups, including bankers, Zionists, Communists and profiteers. The “internationalist”-war that he started on their behalf, has led to the near destruction of our nation, and not its salvation. Those who were taken in by the “Churchill was a great man” nonsense should realise that history books are written by the victors, and the winners were neither the British nor the Germans.

BERLIN (AFP) — One of the long-ignored chapters of World War II hits German screens with a harrowing account of the mass rapes of German women by Russian soldiers as the Nazi regime crumbled around them.

“Anonyma – A Woman in Berlin” stars A-list German actress Nina Hoss and has returned a victim’s anonymous diary to the forefront of an extremely tentative debate about German suffering during and after the war.

“There were tens of thousands (of rape victims) — that is for certain. Perhaps even hundreds of thousands,” US historian Norman Naimark, director of the Center for European Studies at Stanford, told German weekly Die Zeit.

“Some estimates go up to two million if you include all the Eastern European territories with German populations.”

The price German women paid for the revenge taken by Russian soldiers was long unspoken here — overshadowed by the overwhelming guilt of Hitler’s followers.

The new film by Max Faerberboeck, 58, was inspired by the intimate journal a Berlin woman kept from April 20 to June 22, 1945 in which she recounts the excruciating hunger and repeated violations she suffered in the vanquished German capital.

The nameless author bears witness in a laconic tone, with searing insights into the apocalyptic world around her.

The chilling journal was first published in the United States in 1954 and then in several other countries before arriving in West German bookstores in 1959 thanks to a small Swiss publishing house.

It was an era in which no one cared to hear about German suffering after the horrors wrought by Nazi troops — least of all the guilt-wracked Germans.

And in communist East Germany, a Soviet satellite, a blanket of silence suffocated any public discussion until the Berlin Wall fell in 1989.

The diary disappeared into obscurity for nearly half a century until noted writer Hans Magnus Enzenberger had it re-released in 2003. It became a bestseller in Germany.

The author appeared to have been in her 30s, well-educated, with a passion for photography and a basic knowledge of Russian picked up on her extensive travels before the war.

The daily Sueddeutsche Zeitung claimed to have unmasked her in 2003 as Marta Hillers, a journalist who made a name for herself with pro-Nazi propaganda — the prevailing theory to this day.

Although researchers such as Naimark and Britain’s Anthony Beevor have documented the enormous scale of sexual assaults of German women at the war’s end, such first-person accounts are extremely rare in the historical record.

The University of Greifswald in northeastern Germany has just launched what it says will be the first scientific study of the rapes of German women at the end of the war.

The study will focus on Berlin, the surrounding state of Brandenburg and the northeast of the country near today’s Polish border.

It will concentrate on the long-term psychological effects suffered by the affected women, all of whom, if still alive six decades on, are elderly.

The research team is advertising a telephone number for volunteers, just as the film has whipped up renewed public interest in the story.

“Anonyma” itself has received mixed reviews despite a riveting performance by Hoss in the lead role, with critics incensed about the introduction of a love story to the plot.

The journal recounts the woman’s decision to seduce a high-ranking Russian officer so he will protect her from the other soldiers — “packs of wolves”, as she calls them — preying on her and her neighbours.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5j89vme_VctpGdvL5-gqclMDLua3Q

WASHINGTON – A Republican congressman from Georgia said Monday he fears that President-elect Obama will establish a Gestapo-like security force to impose a Marxist dictatorship.

“It may sound a bit crazy and off base, but the thing is, he’s the one who proposed this national security force,” Rep. Paul Broun said of Obama in an interview Monday with The Associated Press. “I’m just trying to bring attention to the fact that we may — may not, I hope not — but we may have a problem with that type of philosophy of radical socialism or Marxism.”

Broun cited a July speech by Obama that has circulated on the Internet in which the then-Democratic presidential candidate called for a civilian force to take some of the national security burden off the military.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27655039/from/ET/

Barack Obama said he would improve the economy. Turns out he already has, at least in one retail niche: gun sales.

Starting in the days before the election, gun shops have been mobbed by buyers who fear that Obama and a larger Democratic majority in Congress will restrict firearm sales.

Many were stocking up on things such as assault rifles, high-capacity magazines and handguns that they think would be the most likely targets of new laws, though practically everything related to shooting has been selling more quickly.

“It’s been an absolute madhouse,” said Trey Pugh, a manager at Jim’s Pawn Shop in Fayetteville, which is selling 15 to 20 AR-15 assault rifles a day. “I’m getting guys come in and say I always wanted that gun, and give me that one too and that one and, oh, I need a gun safe, too.”

Distributors are running out of assault rifles, he said, and prices are rising.

On the stump, Obama didn’t discuss sweeping changes to gun laws. But his stance that local authorities should be able to make “sensible” laws has worried some, as has the fact that many Democrats in Congress favor additional restrictions. The National Rifle Association, among others, stoked these fears during the election.

Many purchases appear to be panic buying, Pugh said, because the government could not pass new gun laws before next year. Between the election, fears that the sour economy will spur more crime, hunting season and Christmas sales, the next couple of months will likely be wild for firearms dealers, he said.

“Everybody, and I mean everybody, is buying guns right now,” Pugh said.

Stores in North Carolina, such as Young Guns in Apex and Perry’s in Wendell, reported hectic sales and lines at cash registers.

“It’s been tremendous,” said Barry Perry of Perry’s Guns in Wendell. “We have so many customers that parking has been a problem.”

Online gun and shooting supply shops say sales in recent weeks climbed along with Obama’s poll numbers.

At Villagetactical.com in Oklahoma City, which concentrates mainly on gun parts, sales have doubled since summer, said owner Andy Glunt.

“Some of them have said that they think if they don’t buy it now, they won’t be able to later,” he said.

Fears of more regulation were fueled by an NRA campaign that said Obama would crack down on guns. That notion was amplified in gun forums such as glocktalk.com and AR15.com, where swarms of posters talked of having bought “Obama guns” or detailed election-related gun and ammo purchases. Some even speculated on things such as how a firearms confiscation plan would work.

It’s hard to gauge the likelihood of new laws. Obama has said that local jurisdictions should be able to impose regulations on guns to reduce crime on city streets. At the same time, he said owning guns, including handguns, is an American tradition and should remain legal.

Obama, who taught constitutional law, has said that he believes gun ownership is an individual right.

It’s also unclear whether a serious push for regulation is likely from Congress. The number of Democrats there who support gun rights has been increasing. Also, the party fell short Tuesday of winning a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate, leaving Republicans leverage against laws they don’t like.

Still, many gun owners fear that Obama will cave in to demands from members of his party who harbor extreme anti-gun views, said Wayne LaPierre, vice-president of the NRA.

Obama campaigned as a supporter of gun rights, but the media never pinned him down completely on contradictions in his record, LaPierre said.

“The reason gun sales are rising is that gun owners and second amendment enthusiasts are justifiably suspicious,” he said.

A Clinton-era ban on some semi-automatic assault weapons and parts such as high-capacity, military-style magazines was a political disaster for the Democrats, said LaPierre. The party would pay an even higher political toll if Obama broke the implicit promises he made to gun owners during the campaign.

Alan Chapman, an IT professional who lives in Durham, bought a rifle similar to the AK-47 and a semi-automatic handgun in recent weeks because he expects tighter laws and higher prices. A neighbour bought a handgun for the same reason, he said.

“I just wish I could afford more,” Chapman said. “Prices are going to go up after the election just based on fear.”

He thinks the Democrats could attack concealed carry permits, but that the most likely change is a new assault weapons ban.

Longtime handgun owner Bob Nitchke of Mooreseville, who posts on glocktalk.com, isn’t thrilled with the possibility of more regulation. But he thinks the panic over Obama is out of proportion to any threat.

“I don’t think anything is going to happen, particularly in the first couple of years,” he said. “I just don’t think it’s a priority right now, because they’ve got bigger things to deal with, like the economy.”

Anything that’s more extreme than the assault weapons ban, such as a bill to stop handgun sales, would be a political disaster, and just seems unlikely.

“What I do know is that gun stores are making a lot of money,” he said.
Glunt, the owner of the online shop, said he wasn’t completely happy about that windfall.

“I’d rather have business a little slower and not have a threat to our second amendment,” he said.