Nordwave Great Britian

May 19

An excellent article courtesy of natfront.com:

Nicholas Soames is peeved because American author Nicholson Baker has written about events in Winston Churchill’s life that the family would rather keep hushed up. The author, whose book has been praised in America, tells of a memo sent by Churchill in 1920, when as Minister for War he wrote that he advocated drastic action against rebels in Iraq, saying “I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas.”

The author also cites an example of Churchill’s inhumanity, when during the Second World War he said “One of our great aims is the delivery on German towns of the largest quantity of bombs per night.” One could also cite how Churchill failed to evacuate the City of Coventry when he knew beforehand the night on which it was to be heavily bombed, or how he sent hundreds of Canadian soldiers over a ridge to a certain death, straight on to German guns. This order prompted Adolf Hitler to write in his diary, something to the effect of, “I cannot understand the inhumanity of the man.”

The British public, angry at Churchill’s warmongering, ditched him at the earliest opportunity. That time came when he was heavily defeated at the first post-war general election. But enough of the past for the moment. What of the current Churchill family?

Although a long-term sitting MP and one-time Minister for the Armed Forces, what exactly has Nicholas Soames, Winston Churchill’s grandson, contributed to the defence of our nation over the past forty years? Precisely nothing! He has sat back, living a life of luxury, watching as Britain has been invaded by hordes of aliens. He has presided over our loss of sovereignty and passively watched as our homeland has been turned into something akin to a violent third-world hell-hole from which thousands of Britons are desperate to escape. As an ex-defence Minister he should know something of the military. Much to his shame, he did nothing to prevent our armed forces from being illegally deployed in the Balkans, Iraq and Afghanistan.

Winston Churchill, another grandson spoke of a collection of pygmies trying to knock Churchill off his pedestal. Despite the media hype, Churchill was never regarded by most troops as the great hero he has been made out to be. Many regular soldiers had no time for him, but they did respect Field Marshall Bernard Montgomery. At least he was prepared to join them in the thick of battle. Parents often name their children after people they admire. There are many boys from the wartime generation named Bernard, but there doesn’t appear to be one called Winston. The only Winston’s anyone encounters seem to be West Indians.

Around twelve years ago, the younger Winston Churchill raised a warning about the lengthy queues of immigrants waiting to get into the UK. Immediately, a large amount of money from public funds was awarded to him for some documents belonging to his famous grandfather. It seemed unlikely there would be any of Winston’s documents that had not already been examined and copied. Unable to judge the situation, many nationalists decided to watch and wait. If he never broached the subject of immigration again, it could be surmised he had been bought off. Well, judge for yourself. He hasn’t raised the subject since.

Apart from leading Europe into a war from which it has never properly recovered, Winston Churchill’s second great crime was making Communism appear respectable to a large percentage of the middle classes. This he did by making a friend and ally of the mass-murderer and Soviet dictator, Joseph Stalin. Churchill also enlisted the help of thousands of Communist thugs whom he used to silence the English anti-war movement. Those anti-British Communist groups, mainly aliens, have been turned into heroes by the left-wing media.

 

Many of the anti-war protesters were fine men who had fought gallantly in the First World War. They bitterly regretted the high cost in European lives that resulted from that pointless conflict. It was these knowledgeable, courageous and patriotic men and women who should have been governing Britain. Instead, the anti-British and anti-European alliance had many hundreds of our finest men arrested and sent to jail, with neither a charge made against them or the possibility of a trial. No doubt the warmongers were prompted into this act of treachery by Joseph Stalin.

Throughout the post-war period, intellectuals, students, liberals and, it seems almost the entire establishment have developed an unhealthy belief in Communism. As a result, the anti-white programme they have propounded has reduced our once-great nation to a shadow of its former self. The permanent damage that Winston Churchill did to Europe and the wider world is enormous, far beyond the comprehension of most people.
Churchill never was the conservative saviour of Britain that those who wrote the history books would have us believe. He was a life-long liberal with close connections to the most scurrilous international financiers, including Bernard Baruch. It was for them that he railroaded Europe into war, and for them that he championed the Zionist/Communist cause. Today the world is ruled by anti white European, and anti-Christian organisations, and more than anyone it was Winston Churchill who gave them that power.

As the Second World War was drawing to a close the “warleader” had sleepless nights worrying over the fact that he had been responsible for the growth of the Soviet menace. True, Winston Churchill was the first public figure to warn of “an iron curtain descending over Europe”. But then he had spent enough time agonising over the advances the Soviet Union and global red menace had been able to make, due to his help.

Since 1939 it has been claimed that our parents and grandparents went to war to defend their country. They did nothing of the kind. Winston Churchill acted as a front man for various self-interested groups, including bankers, Zionists, Communists and profiteers. The “internationalist”-war that he started on their behalf, has led to the near destruction of our nation, and not its salvation. Those who were taken in by the “Churchill was a great man” nonsense should realise that history books are written by the victors, and the winners were neither the British nor the Germans.

May 18

 

 

 

 

 

“The college has given us assurances and we are hopeful for a speedy and amicable resolution to ensure that no further injustice is done to the 3 students who were initially told they would be barred from sitting their exams if they wore their kirpan, their article of faith”: Mejindarpal Kaur, UNITED SIKHS legal director.

 

Leicester, UK: A sixth-form college today said they will allow Sikh students to wear their kirpan, a Sikh article faith, after a 16 year old Sikh girl was stopped two days ago from taking her AS level exams (pre-university) because she wore a kirpan. This ban had also affected two other initiated Sikhs who were also told that they could not sit for their A level exams on Friday. The ban reversal came after the UNITED SIKHS legal team and the Leicester and Nottingham Sikh community leaders worked around the clock with the college to resolve the problem.

 

Parminder Kaur, 16, who was initiated as an Amritdhari Sikh last month and is mandated to wear her kirpan at all times, was in shock when she telephoned UNITED SIKHS on Tuesday to say that she has been asked to leave the exam hall at the Wyggeston and Queen Elizabeth I College, because she wore a kirpan.

 

The school principal, Ian Wilson, who responded to the students’ plight swiftly said, “We will review our policy with respect to the carrying of the kirpan in the next few weeks and in the meantime we will make every effort to ensure that the students are able to take their exams as normal.”

 

“In my time as principal we have had no tension between (students of) different religious groups and I don’t want this to change at all,” he added about the college in Leicester, where 12-14, 000 Sikhs live.

 

“Over the past 24 hours and more I have been feeling stressed and upset at the extremes of which I never believed would be possible, after being removed from my Sociology exam where other students were clearly able to see what was happening,” Parminder Kaur said.

 

“I am glad that the college is allowing me and my fellow Gursikh brother and sister back in. Most of all I am delighted that I have been allowed back into the college to complete my exams wearing my kirpan,” she added.

 

After Parminder Kaur reported the incident, UNITED SIKHS contacted the students’ families and local community leaders for their assistance. “As the students were not being allowed to sit their exams on Friday, we instructed a prominent human rights London law firm, Bindmans LLP and engaged the services of the Equality and Human Rights Commission,” said Mejindarpal Kaur, UNITED SIKHS Legal Director.

 

“We applaud the three Sikh students who, in the midst if their exams, displayed a positive attitude and exemplary strength of character to stand up for their belief and rights. We are very grateful to the assistance provided by the management of the Guru Tegh Bahadur Gurdwara, the SCYS of Nottingham, Davinder Singh, Kuljit Singh, Sukhvinder Singh and Gurjeet Singh,” she added. 

 

An account of the incident on 12th May when Parminder Kaur, 16, was barred from sitting an exam:

 

“I was in my sociology exam when the exam woman came up to me and asked if I was wearing a kirpan. I said yes as I was not prepared to lie. She told me that I wasn’t allowed to wear the kirpan as it was college policy. I then told her that Sikhs were protected by legislation which allowed Sikhs to wear a kirpan. She then said that she was going to have to report me to the office and I just said ok. After five minutes the vice principal (Tim) with another lady from the examinations office and told me to put my pen down and come outside. He then explained that I wasn’t allowed to be in college wearing a kirpan and that included examinations. I told them that I took amrit on the 25th of April and that I was no way prepared to take my kirpan off.”

 

On hearing what had happened to Parminder, her college mates, Baljinder Kaur, 18, and Surjinder Singh, 17, who also wore a kirpan, met Sue Ashwin, the vice principal, to ask why Parminder had been barred from the exams.

 

Surjinder Singh told UNITED SIKHS, “Baljinder and I told Sue Ashwin that the law allowed a Sikh to carry a kirpan. She asked if we could wear a ‘replica’ kirpaan, on a ‘key-ring’. We told her “No”.”

 

When Sue Ashwin discovered that Baljinder Kaur and Surjinder Singh also wore a kirpan she told them to either remove their kirpan or go home and not return to college unless they removed their kirpan or until the matter was ‘investigated further’.

 

“As I still had 2 more lessons to attend, Sue Ashwin asked me if I was willing for someone to ‘look-after’ my kirpaan whilst I went to my lessons. As a practicing Sikh, none of my 5 Ks are to come off my body at any time, therefore I refused, to remove my kirpaan, and left the college premises with Baljinder Kaur,” said Surjinder Singh.

 

Baljinder Kaur and Surjinder Singh’s comments: “The last 24 hours have been a little hectic. However, its all been worth it in the long run, (apart from the very unfortunate exception of Parminder Kaur missing her exam)- hopefully the college will provide some sort of compensation for this. However, on the very very bright side, many people who once saw GuruJi’s kirpan as a mere knife, have now been educated of its deep value and unbreakable bond with a Sikh. The college took a very cooperative approach, and students carrying the kirpan will no longer be treated any different. Hopefully the frequency of such incidents will gradually decrease and diminish. GuruJi teaches us to handle things with love and humility. Its not others’ faults- its our duty to educate and be the example.”: Baljinder Kaur, who was facing a ban of her kirpan at her Leicester college .

 

“At first I was very upset and felt discriminated. Now with the positive outcome, I am looking forward to wearing my kirpan in college. I hope what happened to us will not happen to anyone else,” said Surjinder Singh.

 

http://www.emgonline.co.uk/news.php?news=5080

 

 

May 17

 

Oprah Winfrey’s latest offer was meant to provide a free Kentucky Fried Chicken meal for all her fans.

Instead, it sparked a free-for-all after branches across the States ran out of grilled chicken.

People reported bizarre scenes as disgruntled customers threatened to resort to violence as others staged sit-ins demanding their food.

Worst hit was the East 42nd Street outlet in New York where hundreds turned up at brandishing coupons downloaded from the chat show host’s website.

Each voucher could be redeemed for  two pieces of grilled chicken, two individual side orders and a biscuit.

Unfortunately, KFC appeared to have been inadequately prepared for the onslaught and were soon having to turn furious customers away.

nternet reports of a full-scale riot, however, appear to have been somewhat exaggerated.

‘Some customers were upset because they couldn’t get their chicken, but there was no riot,’ KFC spokesman Laurie Schalow.

Consequences: Oprah’s promotion sparked overwhelming demand

She said the combination of a bad economy and Oprah’s popularity had created a ‘perfect storm’.

We prepared for it. We didn’t prepare for this extreme.’

‘A lot of restaurants experienced very, very heavy traffic with people trying to redeem the coupons,’ she said.

The branch intends to start honouring the coupons again today after the kitchen has been restocked.

Customers have until May 19 to redeem their vouchers.

The coupons were available on Oprah.com for 24 hours from Tuesday after the promotion was announced on her show.

A spokesman for the presenter’s company Harpo Productions in Chicago said they were not aware of any problems with the coupons.

However, pictures of huge queues, closed stores and complaints were still proliferating online today.

 

May 17

A man was seriosuly assaulted by a group of violent school children as he travelled on a tram through Croydon.

The police have released images of tram passengers they would like to speak to in connection with the vicious assault on a 52-year-old man.

The Croydon Tramlink passenger was travelling from Addington to East Croydon when he was attacked by a group of 10 youths.

British Transport Police PC Amy Piper said the incident occurred on May 6 at around 7.25pm.

She said: “The victim was seated on the tram when he was surrounded by a group of about 10 youths, consisting of six girls and four boys, some of them in school uniform.

“The victim was then the subject of an unprovoked attack and was punched and kicked by members of the group.

“This was a ferocious attack and the CCTV clearly shows members of the group laughing and shaking hands following the assault.”Several other passengers on the tram went to the aid of the victim but the group got off the tram leaving the victim with facial injuries which required hospital treatment.

“We’ve seized CCTV from the carriage and are keen to identify anyone who was on the tram who can assist us with this inquiry.”

If you witnessed the attack or if you recognise any members of the group involved in the incident BTP would like to speak to you. Contact BTP on 0800 40 50 40 quoting incident number 499 of 06/05/2009.

http://www.yourlocalguardian.co.uk/news/4372071.Man_assaulted_by_school_children_on_tram/

May 16

AT LEAST two million young ­Romanians intend to leave their ­poverty-stricken homeland – with Britain as their first destination of choice, a survey revealed last night.

One in six 18 to 34-year-olds in one of the EU’s poorest countries say they see no future there and want to quit.

Twenty-one per cent name the UK as their preferred destination, meaning up to 500,000 young Romanians want to move here.

Others intend to start a new life in Spain and Italy, with the two countries respectively the top choice for 16 and 11 per cent of those questioned.

The survey – called Youth And Their Concerns – in which more than 2,000 young Romanians were interviewed last week, found 2.4million think they have no future in their own country.

They said they were fed up with the rampant corruption, poor economy, rising prices and average wages of less than £50 a week. Others simply said they wanted to earn more money.

Yesterday Romanian teacher Ionela Baciu, 29, said: “I want to go to UK. I speak English and I have heard ­salaries are high.”

And doctor Clara Matei said: “I want to go to UK as I’ve heard I’ll be paid a minimum £1,000 a month.”

Last night there was growing alarm over a potential new wave of mass immigration from eastern Europe.

Nigel Farage, leader of the United Kingdom Independence Party, said: “We must end this madness and stop unlimited immigration into Britain.

“The only way we can do this is to leave the EU and take back control of our borders.”

There are already restrictions on Romanians and Bulgarians working in Britain, but up to 100,000 are here. Sir Andrew Green of MigrationWatchUK said: “The UK must keep its labour market closed to unskilled Romanians and Bulgarians.

“The present restrictions are not perfect but what can be done must be done – especially in the depths of a recession.”

Officially, just under a million eastern Europeans have come here since Poland, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovakia and ­Slovenia joined the EU in 2004, with Romania and Bulgaria joining in 2007. The true figure is known to be more than a million, however.

Last night Immigration Minister Phil Woolas said he wanted the ­UK economy to benefit from migrants while protecting British jobs.

A Border Agency spokesman said: “Romanians face strict restrictions. They can only come here to work if we need them.”

http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/101338/Heading-for-the-UK-2m-desperate-Romanians-

May 16

By Rev. Ted Pike

Federal hate crimes bill S. 909 has now passed the House of Representatives and is in the Senate Judiciary Committee. As we anticipate a probable Senate Judiciary hearing on this bill sometime in the next week, we should ask, “Who is behind this unthinkable, pedophile-protecting bill?”

Leaders of the Christian conservative right quickly respond, “Liberals and the homosexual lobby!”

Yes, these two groups lead a list as long as your arm of hate bill supporters. They inhabit the perverted legislative whore-house called “hate crimes law.” Yet they did not design and build the house. To know who did, visit www.adl.org, the website of the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith. There, ADL proudly boasts of their “model anti-hate law” and persuading 45 US states to adopt it.

ADL’s orchestration of hate laws in over 55 Western nations, in addition to the US, is a long, dark story. This article presents a brief chronology of their conspiracy to steal freedom of speech. That attempt is now reaching a momentous climax, for good or evil, in the US Senate.

 

What is ADL? B’nai B’rith (Sons of the Covenant) is an international Jewish religious, fraternal and educational, liberal activist organization. It describes itself as the heart and soul of organized world Jewry. It was founded in New York City in the mid-nineteenth century to further Jewish interests and community in America. In 1913, their Anti-Defamation League was created, ostensibly to combat emerging anti-Semitism.

ADL/B’nai B’rith does not represent the thinking of all Jews. Most American Jews are liberal (AP reported 81% voted for House Democrats in 2009); but a minority vehemently oppose ADL’s secularist agenda and bullying tactics. Rabbi Daniel Lapin warns that ADL (which he calls secular Judaism) is “in relentless attack” on evangelical Christians. His website has even listed a toll-free number for Christians and conservatives to call and report harassment and accusations of “anti-Semitism” from ADL. (1)

Today, there are roughly 200,000 members of B’nai B’rith International (with chapters and lodges in 55 Western nations). Many are Jewish activists who work behind the scenes in governments to pass hate crimes legislation and run hate crimes bureaucracies. ADL efforts have been spectacularly successful. Whether in California, Canada, Iceland, England or Australia—ADL’s terminology, twisted definitions and pretexts for hate crime indictments are identical. ADL phrases such as “bias-motivated hate crime,” “gender identity,” “actual or perceived sexual orientation,” etc., are enshrined in the hate crime laws of most Western industrialized nations today. If a yellow plastic arch rises from an urban horizon in Beijing, you know it comes from McDonald’s in America. So, too, we recognize ADL when pastors in Holland or Australia are indicted for “hate speech,” slapped with severe penalties and physically and financially exhausted in endless attempts to get free from hate crime indictment. ADL of America and Canada, ADL Europe, and ADL Australia are the super-powerful architects and enforcers of hate laws on three continents.

How powerful is ADL? Congressman John Rarrick (in the Congressional Record December 6, 1971) quoted Senator Jack Tenney of California: “The FBI and CIA are tinker toys compared to ADL.”

 

A History of Hate for Christian Values Let’s trace ADL/B’nai B’rith creation of hate laws over the past 38 years.

  • 1971. After ten years lobbying, B’nai B’rith Canada and the Canadian Jewish Congress persuaded Ottawa to enact their federal “anti-hate” law, the Canadian Human Rights Act. Its Sec. 319 and subsequent provincial hate laws criminalize any speech even “likely” to cause hatred or contempt against specially federally protected groups—especially homosexuals, Jews, Muslims, immigrants, but never Christians.
  • 1985. ADL began massive programs to end “bias,” “hate,” and Christian “homophobia” in American businesses, local governments and schools. Since its inception, ADL’s World of Difference program has instructed, according to ADL, “more than 375,000 elementary and secondary school teachers, responsible for nearly 12 million students” toward “tolerance” of homosexuality.(2)
  • 1988. ADL sponsored a nationwide competition open to all law students in America, to craft a “model” anti-hate law for the US. Jewish law student Joseph Ribikoff won first prize with his proposal to criminalize all Christian/conservative leaders who criticize homosexuality as well as all loyal members. (3) Through the 1990s, ADL persuaded roughly 45 states to adopt some version of its refined model hate law. Visit www.adl.org for detailed charts about states’ implementation. During this time ADL also established hate law bureaucracies throughout Europe.
  • 1990. ADL was convicted in a California court of violating the civil rights of more than 10,000 conservatives, pro-lifers, members of the political right and Muslims on whom ADL had spied over the years, keeping secret surveillance files. (4) My father and I were listed in these files gathered in cooperation with West coast police departments.
  • 1990. Congress passed ADL’s Hate Crimes Statistics Act. It mixed synagogue with state, making ADL the hate laws teacher to the US Justice Department, FBI and every police precinct in America. Since then, ADL’s twisted definitions, hate law enforcement methods, and criteria for statistics reporting inform the thinking and reflexes of the US law enforcement system. (5)
  • 1998. ADL introduced its Hate Crimes Prevention Act to Congress, confident of easy passage. Republican leaders in the House and Senate instructed everyone to vote for it. Yet independent-thinking Republicans, dominating Conference between the House and Senate, examined the bill closely. Aghast at its sinister intentions, they stripped it out. Since then, ADL’s federal hate bill has been reintroduced and defeated by Republicans in every session of Congress. Today, with a Democrat-dominated government, ADL eagerly anticipates victory: an ADL-dominated hate crimes bureaucracy in America, ending free speech and persecuting Christians from a hate crimes command center in Washington.
  • 2004. Acting on authority of ADL’s Pennsylvania hate law, ADL national executive board member and Philadelphia DA Lynne Abraham arrested and imprisoned for 21 hours 11 Christians for the “hate crime” of peacefully witnessing to homosexuals. Penalty if convicted of the seven charges would be 47 years in prison and $90,000 fines each. After 3 months they were acquitted.
  • 2004. ADL introduced their No Place for Hate program, which boldly encourages American families to embrace homosexuality, same-sex marriage, etc. No Place for Hate literature is promoted in Barnes and Noble bookstores and at local chapters across the nation. One piece encourages families with young children to invite a homosexual couple for an evening of dinner, fun and fellowship. This, ADL says, will help destroy any “homophobic” attitudes developing in their young minds.
  • 2004. ADL Europe and B’nai B’rith International set up a 56-member hate law bureaucracy in Europe, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). They also persuaded the European Union and Council of Europe to promote the ADL hate law agenda. As part of OSCE, ADL created the International Network Against Cyber-Hate (INACH) dedicated to ending online “hate speech” (really, free speech, such as criticism of homosexuality and Israel). (6)
  • 2006. ADL persuaded Congress to create its Global Office of Anti-Semitism in the US State Department. Every year this ADL front reports on an “epidemic” of anti-Semitism gleaned from ADL statistics gathered worldwide. In last year’s report to Congress, it accused Christians who believe the New Testament account that Jewish leaders had Christ crucified of being “classic anti-Semites”—as was Adolf Hitler. (7) In Canada, any public statement that Jewish leaders killed Christ is considered the hate crime of anti-Semitism, punishable by a minimum $5,000 fine and prison if repeated.
  • 2007. The ADL-inspired Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Act was introduced into Congress. It would set up a federal commission to study and make legislative recommendations to Congress on how to end Christian, conservative, and far right “hate speech” that streams the internet, possibly inciting violent hate crimes. It was unanimously passed by the House. (8)
  • 2008. ADL, through Jewish lesbian activist and state Rep. Sheila Kuehl helped pass California’s SB777, banning criticism of homosexuality in public schools. If any child now criticizes sodomy, he will be expelled. If a teacher or administrator does, they are fired. (9) At the same time, ADL submitted an extensive amicus brief to the California Supreme Court in favor of same-sex marriage. (10) It undoubtedly influenced the Court’s pro-homosexual decision.
  • 2009. With another Jewish activist group, the Southern Poverty Law Center, ADL directed Missouri state police to consider white Christian conservatives, Ron Paul supporters, tax and immigration protestors, pro-lifers, etc., as possible domestic terrorists. (11) Soon after, Janet Nepolitano, who recently delivered an extensive and flattering speech to an ADL convention, issued a very similar directive from the Department of Homeland security, warning America of this threat from the Christian conservative right. (12)
  • 2009. ADL’s federal hate crimes bill passed the House of Representatives 249-175. (13) The Senate version will probably be considered in the Senate Judiciary Tuesday, May 12 at 10am EDT. (14)

 

ADL Hate Laws Target Christians Get the picture? Do you see the trajectory of ADL’s hate law agenda? It means persecution of Christians and other free thinkers.

ADL is a cesspool of anti-Christian, anti-freedom social “civil rights” initiatives. For decades its pipeline of legislative sewage has flowed directly and interminably into Congress. If Americans defeat one ADL-inspired bill, ADL has lined up six more. But unlike most evangelical Christians, ADL will never, never give up—until it has created an “anti-hate” bureaucracy in America, like Canada’s, ending free speech.

What is ADL’s ultimate objective? National director Abraham H. Foxman, author of Never Again? The Threat of the New Anti-Semitism, is a devout Orthodox Jew. In 1991, he angrily vacated his seat in the Orthodox synagogue of Teaneck, New Jersey, because he felt its members and leadership were not praying for Israel as passionately as they should! (15) Foxman says he earnestly looks forward to Israel’s Biblically prophesied “messiah.” Christians know this is not Jesus Christ but that prophesied “man of sin” (John 5:43) whom Jesus said Jews would someday accept in place of Himself. Contemporary Jewish activists, like Foxman, think “the messiah is the Jewish people”— i.e., when Jewish power finally ascends over Christians and Gentiles, Jewish power by itself will make “messiah” happen.

Why does Foxman promote homosexuality, same-sex marriage, pornography (he gave pornographers Hugh and Christy Hefner special “free speech” awards)? (16) Why do ADL and other Jewish “civil liberties” groups, such as the ACLU (17), Southern Poverty Law Center, People for the American Way, etc., do all they can to tear down our crosses, Ten Commandments, manger scenes, Christian symbols (18) and passionately support the killing of 50 million babies through abortion? For that matter, why did the Jewish forefathers of these Jewish supremacists invent and facilitate Communism and socialism (liberalism)—dedicated to breaking down the capitalist free enterprise system? (19) Why does Jewish-dominated media (20) relentlessly corrupt our morals and those of our children, casting aspersions (as in the Da Vinci Code) on the deity and legitimacy of Christ? (21)

Simple.

The Jewish supremacists of ADL/B’nai B’rith know that if Christian nations remain strong, virtuous and industrious, they will never realize their messiah in sovereignty over the nations, ruling the world from Jerusalem. (22)

Even if Christian or conservative leaders know of such demonic aspirations, they will never say it. ADL has them convinced they will be ruined if they do—smeared as “anti-Semites” and abandoned by Israel-first followers who have been conditioned to loathe any hint of criticism of “God’s chosen people.”

If America is to survive, this must change. ADL has brought us the very brink of slavery—intending to herd America into a one-world, international police state. A great abyss of darkness lies just before us.

But it’s we who should push ADL back into this abyss of its own making. Everyone, leaders and followers, should speak out against ADL now! When we collectively identify ADL as the greatest threat to freedom in our history, it will be ADL, not us, who will be ruined.

How can we stop ADL? Begin by defeating its federal hate crimes bill S. 909, now entering a probable first hearing in the Senate Judiciary Committee sometime in this next week.

Call your senators and the members of the Senate Judiciary Committee. If you have time, call all the senators. Their names are listed on the Action page here at www.truthtellers.org. Call 1-877-851-6437 toll-free or 1-202-225-3121 toll. Tell them, “If the senator votes for the pedophile-protecting hate bill, I and all my friends will never, never forgive or forget!”

May 16

A panel of senior Scotland Yard officers and prosecutors are to decide what action to take over claims that MPs misused parliamentary expenses.

Officials will assess whether criminal inquiries are necessary in the wake of a surge in the number of complaints from members of the public.

Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Paul Stephenson and Director of Public Prosecutions Keir Starmer decided to establish the panel.

The move follows several days of speculation as to whether any criminal inquiries would be launched.

A statement issued by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) and Metropolitan Police said: “Before the recent media exposure about alleged misuse of parliamentary expenses, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner instigated meetings between the Metropolitan Police and CPS in relation to a number of allegations made to police.

“Due to the increase in subsequent allegations received by the Metropolitan Police, the Commissioner and Director of Public Prosecutions have jointly decided to convene a panel to assess allegations in order to decide whether criminal investigations should be started.”

It added: “A panel, comprising officers and a senior CPS lawyer, will commence a series of meetings next week.”

Campaign groups have threatened to launch private prosecutions if the Metropolitan Police will not investigate.

Technically, the police are unable to start an investigation until an allegation or a formal complaint is made.

It is understood some senior officers are unwilling for the force to become embroiled in another complex political inquiry.

Previous political probes included investigations dubbed cash-for-hours, donorgate and lords-for-hire.

As the revelations continued this week, the force stuck to its line that it has received and is looking at “a number of complaints”.

But it is clear the number of complaints soared from an initial six, focusing on several high-profile politicians including Chancellor Alistair Darling.

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/4/20090516/tuk-police-consider-expenses-complaints-dba1618.html

May 11

ANNOUNCEMENT of April 30, 2009
by
ESA HENRIK HOLAPPA, US GOVERNMENT PRISONER

FROM SOLITARY CONFINEMENT

Esa Henrik Holappa A087361909
Buffalo Federal Detention Facility
4250 Federal Dr.
Batavia, NY 14020

Almost two months have now passed since that morning, March 9, 2009, around 11:45 am, when US federal agents arrested me – three squad cars – on a country road east of Sarver, Pennsylvania for a “visa violation.” As it quickly became known to me, in fact already during the car ride to the downtown Pittsburgh federal jail and even more so later in questioning, my arrest was politically motivated.

The officer who put me in leg chains and even wrist chains – not mere handcuffs, but wrist chains — said, when I asked why he was arresting me, a perfectly legal applicant for political asylum: Quote:
“Because of your association with Nationalism.”

Federal wrist chains

Since that week, now almost two months ago, I have spent my time, 23.5 hours a day, in a cell in the “SHU,” the “Special Housing Unit.”

The SHU is meant for those whom the facility considers to be “dangerous” or a “threat to the facility’s safety.”


Here I am discovered holding a dangerous cat weapon.

Now, however, I stay voluntarily in the SHU – the director here did offer to release me – because I wish to avoid any contact with the Third World “general population” here or any “incident” that “might happen.” But in my concrete cell I can still hear the melodious sounds of “m—–f——” being yelled.

On Thursday, April 30, and at my request, my October 2008 application for political asylum was withdrawn before the Federal Immigration Court in Buffalo, NY.

This step also means that the federal order issued by the Department of Homeland Security for my “removal,” that is, my deportation back to Europe, will not be blocked any longer by my lawyer, and my expulsion from this beautiful America will go ahead.

Pittsburgh is a beautiful city that I loved, and Pennsylvania has gorgeous countryside.

I and John de Nugent in the building lobby of a high-priced, specialized immigration/asylum lawyer in downtown Pittsburgh in October 2008. John and Margaret spent $2,000 on the law office of Valerie May, whose staff failed to secure one signature on the 16-page asylum application — a mistake which John de Nugent caught, and even though this mistake was remedied the next day, Homeland Security arrested me fully five months later, claiming I had “overstayed my visa.” At my federal asylum scheduling hearing in December in Philadelphia, I was not arrested for this supposed “violation,” and I and my friends saw and heard in that courtroom that several asylum applicants had 1) overstayed their visa, 2) overstayed it for years already, and 3) some had even committed felonies while overstaying their visa – and 4) they were not being arrested or being deported, but instead getting a free lawyer. (The judge said kindly: “You need a lawyer who can do both criminal and immigration law. Here’s a list of free lawyers. Translator, make sure Mr. Ubungu understands that.”) But all these real violators were hispanic – or they were black (as were the judge and the prosecutor).

My deportation back to Finland will take place within a month from this date (April 30).

My deportation also means I cannot return to the soil of the United States of America for TEN YEARS. It is because of the one missing signature that was fixed the next day. But Obama’s aunt can stay… four years after she was ordered deported….. see below.

Janet Napolitano, Secretary of Homeland Security, whose mother’s maiden name was Winer.

Why did I drop my asylum application?

Well, it was obvious by my very arrest by Homeland Security’s ICE division (“Immigration and Customs Enforcement”) that the government that is ruling over the American people did not want me to stay here and did not want to approve my asylum application, nor do I think the black judge would have done so once she understood that I am pro-white. (Valerie May had suggested I would get a favorable judge whom she knew – and, although she did not say so, a white judge — but this judge was then removed from my case in favor of a black woman.)


I was proud to speak in November 2008 at Dr. David Duke’s EURO conference in Memphis, Tennessee, alongside Paul Fromm, my Scandinavian brother Knut Eriksen from Denmark, and other fearless comrades. After all, you have freedom of speech here in America, right? Statue of Liberty, huddling masses yearning to be free?

Barack Hussein Obama’s aunt, “Zeituni Onyango,” has been living in Boston, Massachusetts illegally since 2004, but the immigration judge’s 2004 deportation order has been blocked since then, and “Aunt Zeituni” is now living in public housing – as a deportable illegal alien – in the once all-white (and Irish) South Boston section.

[source: “Barack Obama's Aunt and Uncle Found Living in Poverty”
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1164232/barack_obamas_aunt_and_uncle_found.html?cat=9)

Quote:
Zeituni Onyango, who was prominently mentioned as "Aunt Zeituni" in Barack Obama's memoirs Dreams from My Father, lives in a disabled access apartment in a rundown section of Boston. Zeituni Onyango lives with her brother Omar. Zeituni Onyango is apparently without employment, but does some volunteer work and contributed some money to her nephew's campaign.

Omar, known as "Uncle Omar" in Barack Obama's memoirs, has also had hard times since moving to America. He was evicted from a previous apartment, lost a business, and was once attacked in an armed robbery.

Barack Obama, who is a millionaire and live[d] in a tony section of Chicago, has had to endure controversy before when it was revealed that his half-brother George lives in a shack in a poor area in Nairobi, Kenya. Eyebrows have been raised at why a politician, who often touts the virtues of sharing and “spreading the wealth,” seems unable or unwilling to help out relatives who are in need.

Barack Obama once boasted about he used to share his toys as a kindergartener. But the revelation of a brother and now an aunt and uncle living in squalid poverty proves, if nothing else, that Barack Obama has a little trouble with the concept of sharing as an adult.

Ed Morrissey, of Hotair.com, put it very well. “[The New Testament Gospel of] Matthew speaks of all men as brothers, but a failure to care for family speaks much louder than a failure to care for strangers. It makes Obama look a little hypocritical, especially after featuring Zeituni and Omar in one of the books that now provide a healthy income for the presidential candidate.”
But my decision to withdraw my asylum application was based on new legal developments in my home country of Finland.

Almost one year ago, on May 11, 2008, while I was heading on a tourist visit to neighboring Estonia, I got a phone call from the police investigator in my city of Oulu.

Oulu is a city of about 130,000 located on the western Finnish coast about where the final letter in the word “Bothnia” (“a”) is located.

This policewoman informed me that the state prosecutor Mika Illman (who handles all major so-called “hate-speech crimes”) had decided to ”have a look at my case.” A week later I was summoned to the police station to be interrogated on suspicion of “incitement of racial hatred.” Two more charges with which I was threatened were “aggravated defamation” (of the black community, which I accused of harboring gang rapists) and “copyright violation.”

I had already been arrested previously, at age 20, and was held in jail without being able to make a phone call from January 16 to 19, 2007. At that time I was “suspected’ of having written a defamatory article about a Sudanese immigrant teenager and his Israeli friends. The important newspaper for northern Finland called Kaleva, published in my city of Oulu, had published the photo of these youngsters on its website on January 5, 2007. I admit my “crime” of right-clicking on this photo jpeg and sending it to an American friend! It was part of a private email to a friend, not a commercial undertaking. The picture, which had already appeared on the Finnish newspaper’s website, then appeared on an American website and discussion of the photo on that website’s discussion forum.

For this crime of Americans using a Finnish newspaper’s photo Mika Illman wanted me to go to prison for six months. (Meanwhile Africans are gang-raping Finnish girls.)

The American website as well as its forum had already published my articles about multiculturalism
and gang rapes in my city of Oulu. There was my article “Multiculturalism – an impossible vision,” and several other articles that this American website published for Finns in our own Finnish language. Some articles on the American website had even been published by the Kaleva newspaper itself under my name!

We have no racial freedom of speech in Finland, so this was a nice service to publish these articles in Finnish. In any case, the Oulu police wrongly concluded that I had written all the Finnish material on the website and forum, including one I had not even read when I was arrested. But this article “defamed the honor” of the Sudanese (think Darfur) and of his Israeli friends.

The police even accused me of being the webmaster of this American site! No, that was far beyond my Internet competency then or now.

During my three days in jail, with the light on day and night, the police determined there was no evidence of my “guilt” and let me go. Even so, I found out later that the state prosecutor Illman had decided to ”make an example” of me so as to “crush racism” in Finland. (That is, white racism, not black racism.) I was already convicted in their minds, and in May 2008 my lawyer told me that I was facing 4.5 YEARS in prison. It was quite that serious.

However, I believe that the real reason for my arrest and later persecution lay in my critical article “Multiculturalism – an impossible vision.” This article was translated into German and published as “Multikultur – eine unmögliche Vision” by the WN published Wigbert Grabert in his excellent historical magazine Deutschland in Geschichte und Gegenwart [ = “Germany in History and the Present”] in the spring of 2006 (when I was 19).

This article must have seemed pretty potent to the enemies of our race, because the publisher himself, Wigbert Grabert, was then indicted just for publishing my article on the charge of “Volksverhetzung” [ = “incitement of racial hatred”]! I think the enemy did not like my mentioning of the explosive issue of African gang rapists in my city of Oulu. I was detained by the state security police, SUPO, on August 8, 2006 and interrogated about this article.

Interestingly, they were inflicting this on me, in a supposed democracy with a guarantee of free speech, on the very day that Herr Grabert was in a German court because of the German government’s objections to my article. On the day I was released, this peaceful publisher of opinions about history
and current events was sentenced to a fine of three thousand euros [four thousand dollars, a lot for a small publisher) and a prison sentence with probation (which means they can still send you to prison if you commit another “speech crime” during probation).

So many coincidences, which all suggest that one big Hidden Hand behind the scenes is directing multiple governments.

There were two things I learned myself about the state from the interrogations by SUPO and by the criminal police: 1) they wanted to know why I wold write such things and what my goal was; 2) they wanted me to believe that my nationist way of thinking now belonged to “the history books.”

Of course, the Hidden Hand got its newspaper Kaleva into the act as well. In its article of January 16, 2007, and violating Finnish press customs, they published my name and home address although I had not been convicted of any crime, merely arrested (and in fact released). This was a nice gesture in a city with now thousands of Africans living there, some of whom live in fact very near my then apartment. The newspaper also published, as if they were cooperating with the police as one entity, detailed information about my friends and political connections. Kaleva also published the lie that I was the administrator of the aforementioned American website!

So by the year 2008 Finland’s top prosecutor, Mika Illman, had decided to prosecute me after I had received much attention from three sources: 1) the state security police SUPO, which is a bit like the American FBI, but was organized by the Soviet KGB itself during the long period when the Soviets did not occupy but instead dominated my country, from 1944-91, when we were, as they say in English, “finlandized.” This term means we were economically and politically controlled by placing key Soviet operatives in key positions of the Finnish government and police. Now the only change is that our bureaucracy has a new master. The second group hounding me was the criminal police, and the third was the largest newspaper in northern Finland, Kaleva, which continued writing about me after I had already left Finland for Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania in America in July 2008!

I can say with some satisfaction that because of my “icy” arrest now – as a totally innocent and legal applicant for asylum and then confinement to solitary – by ICE (“Immigrations and Customs Enforcement”), which caused my friends such as John de Nugent and Major William Fox USMCR, and my Finnish comrades, and comrades Erick and Pamela, and others, to create huge publicity about my case, I have become even more well-known now – both in Finland and around the world. I have learned the happy news even here in solitary that there are now over 11,300 web pages about my struggle and ordeal and 25 pages under “Henrik Holappa” in the search engine Google – and there are support websites suchs www.enationalist.com/forum, Major Fox’s extensive webpage on me at www.americafirstbooks.com, and supportive threads on several WN forums with full details.

Major Fox, whose mother is from Scandinavia, from Norway (and northern Norway, by the way, was settled by Finns and is even called Finnmark; Narvik, the site of a major WWII battle, is in this region), did a huge amount of work on my behalf by in sending emails to every single Finnish-American association – and also to every single one of the hundreds of legislators in both the Finnish and Norwegian parliaments, exposing to them the outrageous facts about my arrest and confinement and no dout causing much discussion behind the scenes – about the dictatorship of political correctness and about my original issue, immigrants gang-raping Scandinavian women. I have just learned that now Norway is starting to openly discuss the terrible wave of gang rapes by Muslim immigrants, and is opposing Israel more and more openly.

Major William B. Fox, USMCR, Harvard Business School graduate and owner of www.amfirstbooks.com. (The mother of the 6′5” Bill Fox is a Norwegian citizen. All the Scandinavian countries are closely bound by ties of blood, culture and, until recently at least, religion – Lutheranism.)

When I helped Major Fox move his belongings into John’s home in January, I had no idea that soon he, Bill and Margi would be battling for my freedom.

I am sure that the enemy of freedom is now bitter that after all this, I am now far more famous than ever before, and certainly the most known white nationist in my home country.

Son after my arrest on March 9, Kaleva printed an article about my incarceration. And a few weeks later I heard the most amazing news, which I never expected to hear, and probably none of my friends and supporters in Finland, the rest of Europe, or America expected either.

This was the amazing news:

After being assured by the criminal policewoman in May 2008 that I was about to be indicted by the top prosecutor, Illman himself, to “make an example of me” and to “crush racism” in all Finland, and show by my prosecution and severe punishment that the state now had a serious program in effect to eliminate all white racial solidarity, and with my lawyer warning me that I therefore I could expect 4.5 years in prison — all three charges – “racial incitement,” “defaming the honor of the black community” and “copyright violation” – were now DROPPED and I was told “the case is closed”!

So suddenly I did not commit any Orwellian crimes of “violation of freedom of speech.” (If you speak out in Finland about anything racial, you are “violating” freedom of speech….)

This is of course very good news, that I am not facing prison! (Not at the moment….)

It also forms a parallel to the David Duke case in Prague, Czech Republic, where he was arrested – and then released and expelled, not indicted. The result of Illman’s decision, reversing his stated intention of last summer, is also bad news for me. Because it means I am no longer in imminent danger of political persecution in my homeland, I now have no more grounds for applying for political asylum here, and US Homeland Security can now easily do what they really want – to deport me out of America, a huge and exciting country I really began to like very much and where I now have deep friendships and strong contacts with American comrades after eight months in freedom (from July 2008 to early March 2009).

At my April 7 court hearing my main asylum hearing was scheduled for July 6, but as of April 3o, I have dropped my asylum application since there is no prosecution awaiting me in Finland and frankly I am tired of spending 23.5 hours a day in a concrete cell, and only exercising and reading and writing letters to and from good comrades around the world, comrades whom I thank very much, and especially one in Scotland. I have also had good visits here in prison in upstate New York, far from most comrades, with one driving ten hours one-way just to see me for 45 minutes, and I expect at least one more from Pennsylvania.

I cannot know, since I am not allowed a crystal ball in isolation, what the future will bring, but certainly changes are coming. I can only speculate why Mika Illman dropped the serious charges meant to “crush racism in the whole country.” They wanted to silence me and they want to silence you, and most of all silence the truth. They want to paint us as “evil” and “haters.” But I and thousands of comrades, and key volunteers such as John de Nugent, Margaret Huffstickler and Major Bill Fox, have shown that our truth cannot be silenced, and that the state will feel the consequences of persecuting white nationists in Finland, Czech Republic, America and elsewhere.

The state is seeing that there are those who do not wait defensively to be arrested and submit to prosecution and chains on their wrists and legs. They now know there are those who proudly stand up and say to the Power:

“You are a tyrant and you are a liar!”

Now there are others in Finland who are still being prosecuted by the government for this Orwellian “violation of freedom of speech.” (I suppose in America they will call it “abusing reasonable limitations on freedom of speech designed to prevent violence between communities,” as in Canada.) All those targeted for punishment need to make the decision: will you quietly submit, or will you directly challenge the state prosecutor with your supporters so that the persecution becomes a public-relations fiasco for the state?

My days in this extraordinary country called America are rapidly coming to the end. I may be gone within two weeks, but almost certainly by the end of May. These eight months that I spent as a free man in Pittsburgh and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in Memphis, Tennessee, in Cincinnati, Ohio, in and Baltimore, Maryland and in the gleaming white marble city of Washington DC, now filled with dark people, have given me a new view of things and have been a graduation to a new ability to lead.

I have seen in America what Finland some day could look like.

As for the two months spent in this facility, they have not been enjoyed, but they have not been wasted either. I did some important thinking and made some important decisions. These will affect my personal life and my leadership of the Finnish Resistance Movement as we approach a new decade.

I want now to thank all and everyone who has written me and sent me postage stamps, money orders, and paid to set up a phone account. I express my deep gratitude to all who have worked hard to create websites, write articles and posts about my case, and every other act of help whether known to others or only to your heart. I appreciate as only a prisoner in solitary can all you have done for me. I rejoice that through my suffering and your solidarity with me now thousands more have awoken to the need to defend and keep freedom of speech. You and I together have made our movement stronger!

And now I return to Europe, to unfree Europe, to battle to get the freedoms we need back.
Esa Henrik Holappa

April 30, 2009
still in captivity in Batavia Detention Facility

May 01


(CNN)
— Accused Nazi guard John Demjanjuk on Friday was cleared for deportation when a federal appeals court refused to halt his transfer to Germany.

Demjanjuk’s health was at the center of his attorney’s request to prevent the deportation, which was heard by a three-judge panel of the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati, Ohio.

Demjanjuk, 89, is wanted by German authorities for his alleged involvement during World War II in killings at Sobibor, a Nazi death camp in Poland.
The appeals court originally granted an emergency stay April 14, less than two hours after federal immigration officials took Demjanjuk into custody at his home near Cleveland, Ohio.

The court approved the temporary stay after a federal immigration board rejected an emergency appeal for Demjanjuk’s deportation. His attorney, John Broadley, had argued that deporting him would constitute torture because of his health problems.

Broadley has said Demjanjuk suffers from pre-leukemia, kidney problems, spinal problems and “a couple of types of gout.”

The deportation of Demjanjuk, who was transported to an Ohio detention facility when the stay was issued, is expected to set the stage for an extraordinary German war crimes trial.

The case represents one of the longest-running pursuits of an alleged Holocaust perpetrator in history.
http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/05/01/us.nazi.suspect/index.html

__________________